2017•Unpublished venueOpen access

Wittgenstein, naturalism, and scientism

Benedict Smith

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Wittgenstein&s;s contributions to philosophy include numerous remarks that indicate his attitude towards science and, in particular, the relation between science and philosophy. While Wittgenstein&s;s views are not anti-science they do convey a staunch anti-scientism. Naturalism is a view about the relation between science and philosophy, one that privileges the metaphysical and epistemological status of science. Scientism could be construed as an especially strong form of naturalism. Huw Price has drawn a contrast between what he calls object naturalism and subject naturalism. Object naturalism is the view that in some important sense, all there is is the world studied by science. Subject naturalism, in contrast, is not primarily a view about what entities exist, taking the ontology of natural science as its guide and then regarding our practices and discourse in light of that. The author has tried to show that while such a form of understanding is threatened by scientism it need not be so threatened by naturalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wittgenstein&s;s contributions to philosophy include numerous remarks that indicate his attitude towards science and, in particular, the relation between science and philosophy. While Wittgenstein&s;s views are not anti-science they do convey a staunch anti-scientism. Naturalism is a view about the relation between science and philosophy, one that privileges the metaphysical and epistemological status of science. Scientism could be construed as an especially strong form of naturalism. Huw Price has drawn a contrast between what he calls object naturalism and subject naturalism. Object naturalism is the view that in some important sense, all there is is the world studied by science. Subject naturalism, in contrast, is not primarily a view about what entities exist, taking the ontology of natural science as its guide and then regarding our practices and discourse in light of that. The author has tried to show that while such a form of understanding is threatened by scientism it need not be so threatened by naturalism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wittgenstein&s;s contributions to philosophy include numerous remarks that indicate his attitude towards science and, in particular, the relation between science and philosophy. While Wittgenstein&s;s views are not anti-science they do convey a staunch anti-scientism. Naturalism is a view about the relation between science and philosophy, one that privileges the metaphysical and epistemological status of science. Scientism could be construed as an especially strong form of naturalism. Huw Price has drawn a contrast between what he calls object naturalism and subject naturalism. Object naturalism is the view that in some important sense, all there is is the world studied by science. Subject naturalism, in contrast, is not primarily a view about what entities exist, taking the ontology of natural science as its guide and then regarding our practices and discourse in light of that. The author has tried to show that while such a form of understanding is threatened by scientism it need not be so threatened by naturalism.

Key concepts: Scientism, Naturalism, Epistemology, Metaphysics, Object (grammar), Philosophy, Ontology, Relation (database)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Wittgenstein, naturalism, and scientism — Research Paper | ScholarLens