2017Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University)Open access

Threshold Concepts in Academic Practice: Engagement with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

Anne Margaret Tierney

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the existence and nature of threshold concepts as experienced by a group of twenty-one teaching-focused academics, from life science departments in UK universities. Individuals were invited to take part in the study and asked to fill in a survey about their roles as academics. Participants in the study were interviewed about their experiences with the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), using a graph generated from their responses to the survey as a mediating artefact. Interview transcripts were analysed and comments categorized according to Trigwell, Martin, Benjamin & Prosser’s (2000) Model of Scholarship. Threshold Concepts were identified in three out of four of Trigwell et al’s dimensions of scholarship, mainly at the level moving from the disciplinary to the mainstream context of education. In addition, other threshold concepts were identified that were outside Trigwell et al’s (2000) model of scholarship. These findings have implications for academics engaging with SoTL, their audiences, and academic developers delivering postgraduate teaching qualifications in higher education.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper investigates the existence and nature of threshold concepts as experienced by a group of twenty-one teaching-focused academics, from life science departments in UK universities. Individuals were invited to take part in the study and asked to fill in a survey about their roles as academics. Participants in the study were interviewed about their experiences with the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), using a graph generated from their responses to the survey as a mediating artefact. Interview transcripts were analysed and comments categorized according to Trigwell, Martin, Benjamin & Prosser’s (2000) Model of Scholarship. Threshold Concepts were identified in three out of four of Trigwell et al’s dimensions of scholarship, mainly at the level moving from the disciplinary to the mainstream context of education. In addition, other threshold concepts were identified that were outside Trigwell et al’s (2000) model of scholarship. These findings have implications for academics engaging with SoTL, their audiences, and academic developers delivering postgraduate teaching qualifications in higher education.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper investigates the existence and nature of threshold concepts as experienced by a group of twenty-one teaching-focused academics, from life science departments in UK universities. Individuals were invited to take part in the study and asked to fill in a survey about their roles as academics. Participants in the study were interviewed about their experiences with the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL), using a graph generated from their responses to the survey as a mediating artefact. Interview transcripts were analysed and comments categorized according to Trigwell, Martin, Benjamin & Prosser’s (2000) Model of Scholarship. Threshold Concepts were identified in three out of four of Trigwell et al’s dimensions of scholarship, mainly at the level moving from the disciplinary to the mainstream context of education. In addition, other threshold concepts were identified that were outside Trigwell et al’s (2000) model of scholarship. These findings have implications for academics engaging with SoTL, their audiences, and academic developers delivering postgraduate teaching qualifications in higher education.

Key concepts: Scholarship, Mainstream, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Context (archaeology), Discipline, Sociology, Higher education, Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Threshold Concepts in Academic Practice: Engagement with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning — Research Paper | ScholarLens