2017•Obstetrics and GynecologyRequires access

Analysis of Screening Women for Cervical Cancer Following an Excision for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia [14E]

Ethan A. Talbot, Kimberly Hunt, Christopher Michael Morosky

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed if the 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests can be successfully applied to a group of women who were treated with an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study encompassed all patients at an academic medical center who underwent an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia from 2001 to 2013. We performed a comparative model analysis by applying the 2012 updated management and screening guidelines to a patient population that had previously undergone traditional screening. Our primary outcomes were identification of dysplasia recurrence and over-screening. We also identified characteristics associated with an increased risk of dysplasia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 493 subjects contributed 505 specimens and 2247 subsequent pap smears to the final study population. Eighteen subjects (3.65%) underwent an intervention for recurrence. Compared to traditional screening, the 2012 management guidelines identified less recurrence (100% vs. 97.0%, P=0.001), but greatly reduced over-screening (39.2% vs 8.5%, P CONCLUSION: Application of the 2012 updated consensus guidelines to patients who have undergone an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia results in a marginal decrease in identification of dysplasia recurrence which is balanced by a significant decrease in over-screening.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed if the 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests can be successfully applied to a group of women who were treated with an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study encompassed all patients at an academic medical center who underwent an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia from 2001 to 2013. We performed a comparative model analysis by applying the 2012 updated management and screening guidelines to a patient population that had previously undergone traditional screening. Our primary outcomes were identification of dysplasia recurrence and over-screening. We also identified characteristics associated with an increased risk of dysplasia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 493 subjects contributed 505 specimens and 2247 subsequent pap smears to the final study population. Eighteen subjects (3.65%) underwent an intervention for recurrence. Compared to traditional screening, the 2012 management guidelines identified less recurrence (100% vs. 97.0%, P=0.001), but greatly reduced over-screening (39.2% vs 8.5%, P CONCLUSION: Application of the 2012 updated consensus guidelines to patients who have undergone an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia results in a marginal decrease in identification of dysplasia recurrence which is balanced by a significant decrease in over-screening.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed if the 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests can be successfully applied to a group of women who were treated with an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study encompassed all patients at an academic medical center who underwent an excisional procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia from 2001 to 2013. We performed a comparative model analysis by applying the 2012 updated management and screening guidelines to a patient population that had previously undergone traditional screening. Our primary outcomes were identification of dysplasia recurrence and over-screening. We also identified characteristics associated with an increased risk of dysplasia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 493 subjects contributed 505 specimens and 2247 subsequent pap smears to the final study population. Eighteen subjects (3.65%) underwent an intervention for recurrence. Compared to traditional screening, the 2012 management guidelines identified less recurrence (100% vs. 97.0%, P=0.001), but greatly reduced over-screening (39.2% vs 8.5%, P CONCLUSION: Application of the 2012 updated consensus guidelines to patients who have undergone an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia results in a marginal decrease in identification of dysplasia recurrence which is balanced by a significant decrease in over-screening.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dysplasia, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Cervical cancer, Colposcopy, Population, Obstetrics, Gynecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Screening Women for Cervical Cancer Following an Excision for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia [14E] — Research Paper | ScholarLens