2017Australasian Philosophical ReviewOpen access

From Kantianism to Aesthetic Hedonism: Aesthetic Pleasure Revised

Jennifer A. McMahon

Open full text 22 citations

Abstract

No matter how unintuitive it might seem that aesthetic pleasure should be the point where art and morality meet (in terms of philosophical structure and import), this is a noteworthy possibility th...

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No matter how unintuitive it might seem that aesthetic pleasure should be the point where art and morality meet (in terms of philosophical structure and import), this is a noteworthy possibility th...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No matter how unintuitive it might seem that aesthetic pleasure should be the point where art and morality meet (in terms of philosophical structure and import), this is a noteworthy possibility th...

Key concepts: Pleasure, Hedonism, Aesthetics, Morality, Philosophy, Point (geometry), Aesthetic experience, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Kantianism to Aesthetic Hedonism: Aesthetic Pleasure Revised — Research Paper | ScholarLens