2008•The Journal of Indian Orthodontic SocietyRequires access

An Evaluation of Dental Crowding in Relation to the Mesiodistal Crown Widths and Arch Dimensions

Sangeeta A. Golwalkar, Keki M. Msitry

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The present study was carried out to examine the extent to which tooth size and jaw size each contribute to dental crowding. Two groups of dental casts were selected on the basis of crowding. One group exhibited gross dental crowding and the second group little or no crowding. Means and standard deviations of the following parameters were treated to statistical analysis. 1) Collective Mesiodistal tooth widths. ) Arch perimeters. ) Buccal arch widths. ) Lingual arch widths. Statistically there were no significant differences in the collective mesiodistal teeth dimensions but significant differences were found between the dental arch dimensions of the two groups. The crowded group was found to have smaller dental arch dimensions than the noncrowded group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present study was carried out to examine the extent to which tooth size and jaw size each contribute to dental crowding. Two groups of dental casts were selected on the basis of crowding. One group exhibited gross dental crowding and the second group little or no crowding. Means and standard deviations of the following parameters were treated to statistical analysis. 1) Collective Mesiodistal tooth widths. ) Arch perimeters. ) Buccal arch widths. ) Lingual arch widths. Statistically there were no significant differences in the collective mesiodistal teeth dimensions but significant differences were found between the dental arch dimensions of the two groups. The crowded group was found to have smaller dental arch dimensions than the noncrowded group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present study was carried out to examine the extent to which tooth size and jaw size each contribute to dental crowding. Two groups of dental casts were selected on the basis of crowding. One group exhibited gross dental crowding and the second group little or no crowding. Means and standard deviations of the following parameters were treated to statistical analysis. 1) Collective Mesiodistal tooth widths. ) Arch perimeters. ) Buccal arch widths. ) Lingual arch widths. Statistically there were no significant differences in the collective mesiodistal teeth dimensions but significant differences were found between the dental arch dimensions of the two groups. The crowded group was found to have smaller dental arch dimensions than the noncrowded group.

Key concepts: Crowding, Arch, Crown (dentistry), Dental arch, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Mathematics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Evaluation of Dental Crowding in Relation to the Mesiodistal Crown Widths and Arch Dimensions — Research Paper | ScholarLens