2012Unpublished venueOpen access

Rethinking terrorism in international law : an enquiry into the legal concept of international state terrorism

Vito Todeschini

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This thesis investigates the concept of international state terrorism with a view to providing a legal definition thereof. It proposes to qualify certain uses of state armed force in the light of the category of international terrorism. The latter is understood as the commission of violent acts aimed at spreading terror among a population in order to achieve political goals, and is usually identified as an activity solely perpetrated by non-state actors. However, in international relations states do resort to terrorism against other states. That is to say, armed force is at times used to coerce another state’s government by means of directly targeting its population. This use of force relies on large-scale violations of human rights and should be tackled specifically. The paradigm at stake is proposed drawing on existing documents and academic studies. Elements are derived, on the one hand, from the definitions of peacetime and wartime terrorism; on the other hand, from the legal definition of aggression and the analysis of war-like use of force. The overall aim of the research is both to provide a substantive definition of international state terrorism and to identify which legal consequences it would entail in terms of international responsibility

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This thesis investigates the concept of international state terrorism with a view to providing a legal definition thereof. It proposes to qualify certain uses of state armed force in the light of the category of international terrorism. The latter is understood as the commission of violent acts aimed at spreading terror among a population in order to achieve political goals, and is usually identified as an activity solely perpetrated by non-state actors. However, in international relations states do resort to terrorism against other states. That is to say, armed force is at times used to coerce another state’s government by means of directly targeting its population. This use of force relies on large-scale violations of human rights and should be tackled specifically. The paradigm at stake is proposed drawing on existing documents and academic studies. Elements are derived, on the one hand, from the definitions of peacetime and wartime terrorism; on the other hand, from the legal definition of aggression and the analysis of war-like use of force. The overall aim of the research is both to provide a substantive definition of international state terrorism and to identify which legal consequences it would entail in terms of international responsibility

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This thesis investigates the concept of international state terrorism with a view to providing a legal definition thereof. It proposes to qualify certain uses of state armed force in the light of the category of international terrorism. The latter is understood as the commission of violent acts aimed at spreading terror among a population in order to achieve political goals, and is usually identified as an activity solely perpetrated by non-state actors. However, in international relations states do resort to terrorism against other states. That is to say, armed force is at times used to coerce another state’s government by means of directly targeting its population. This use of force relies on large-scale violations of human rights and should be tackled specifically. The paradigm at stake is proposed drawing on existing documents and academic studies. Elements are derived, on the one hand, from the definitions of peacetime and wartime terrorism; on the other hand, from the legal definition of aggression and the analysis of war-like use of force. The overall aim of the research is both to provide a substantive definition of international state terrorism and to identify which legal consequences it would entail in terms of international responsibility

Key concepts: Terrorism, Peacetime, Use of force, Political science, State (computer science), International law, Law, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rethinking terrorism in international law : an enquiry into the legal concept of international state terrorism — Research Paper | ScholarLens