2017PeerJOpen access

Preliminary observations on the age and growth of dog snapper ( Lutjanus jocu ) and mahogany snapper ( Lutjanus mahogoni ) from the Southeastern U.S.

Jennifer C. Potts, Michael L. Burton

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Dog snapper ( Lutjanus jocu Bloch and Schneider 1801) and mahogany snapper ( Lutjanus mahogoni Cuvier 1828) are infrequently caught snappers in the southeastern U.S. primarily occurring off of southern Florida. The species were opportunistically sampled from commercial and recreational fisheries in the southeastern U.S. from 1979 to 2015. Fish were aged (56 dog snapper and 54 mahogany snapper) by counting opaque zones on sectioned sagittal otoliths. Otoliths of both species were easily interpretable and agreement between readers was acceptable. Analysis of otolith edge-type revealed that annuli formed between May and July on both species. Dog snapper ranged from 200–837 mm total length (TL) and ages 2–33, while mahogany snapper ranged from 270–416 mm TL and ages 2–18. The Von Bertalanffy growth equations were L t = 746(1–e (−0.20( t −0.32)) ) and L t = 334(1–e (0.31( t +1.19)) ) for dog snapper and mahogany snapper, respectively. The weight-length relations were W = 1.31 × 10 −5 L 3.03 ( n = 78, r 2 = 0.99) and W = 5.40 × 10 −6 L 3.15 ( n = 79, r 2 = 0.79) for dog snapper and mahogany snapper, respectively, where W = whole weight in grams.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Dog snapper ( Lutjanus jocu Bloch and Schneider 1801) and mahogany snapper ( Lutjanus mahogoni Cuvier 1828) are infrequently caught snappers in the southeastern U.S. primarily occurring off of southern Florida. The species were opportunistically sampled from commercial and recreational fisheries in the southeastern U.S. from 1979 to 2015. Fish were aged (56 dog snapper and 54 mahogany snapper) by counting opaque zones on sectioned sagittal otoliths. Otoliths of both species were easily interpretable and agreement between readers was acceptable. Analysis of otolith edge-type revealed that annuli formed between May and July on both species. Dog snapper ranged from 200–837 mm total length (TL) and ages 2–33, while mahogany snapper ranged from 270–416 mm TL and ages 2–18. The Von Bertalanffy growth equations were L t = 746(1–e (−0.20( t −0.32)) ) and L t = 334(1–e (0.31( t +1.19)) ) for dog snapper and mahogany snapper, respectively. The weight-length relations were W = 1.31 × 10 −5 L 3.03 ( n = 78, r 2 = 0.99) and W = 5.40 × 10 −6 L 3.15 ( n = 79, r 2 = 0.79) for dog snapper and mahogany snapper, respectively, where W = whole weight in grams.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Dog snapper ( Lutjanus jocu Bloch and Schneider 1801) and mahogany snapper ( Lutjanus mahogoni Cuvier 1828) are infrequently caught snappers in the southeastern U.S. primarily occurring off of southern Florida. The species were opportunistically sampled from commercial and recreational fisheries in the southeastern U.S. from 1979 to 2015. Fish were aged (56 dog snapper and 54 mahogany snapper) by counting opaque zones on sectioned sagittal otoliths. Otoliths of both species were easily interpretable and agreement between readers was acceptable. Analysis of otolith edge-type revealed that annuli formed between May and July on both species. Dog snapper ranged from 200–837 mm total length (TL) and ages 2–33, while mahogany snapper ranged from 270–416 mm TL and ages 2–18. The Von Bertalanffy growth equations were L t = 746(1–e (−0.20( t −0.32)) ) and L t = 334(1–e (0.31( t +1.19)) ) for dog snapper and mahogany snapper, respectively. The weight-length relations were W = 1.31 × 10 −5 L 3.03 ( n = 78, r 2 = 0.99) and W = 5.40 × 10 −6 L 3.15 ( n = 79, r 2 = 0.79) for dog snapper and mahogany snapper, respectively, where W = whole weight in grams.

Key concepts: Lutjanidae, Fishery, Otolith, Perciformes, Biology, Fish <Actinopterygii>

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preliminary observations on the age and growth of dog snapper ( Lutjanus jocu ) and mahogany snapper ( Lutjanus mahogoni ) from the Southeastern U.S. — Research Paper | ScholarLens