2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Net income, gross income, and bias in child support awards in gross income-shares states

Jessie X. Fan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this study I discuss the pros and cons of using net income vs. gross income in gross income-shares states. It is argued that the “standardized net ” approach is the best approach in determining child support awards based on the combined principles of equity and accuracy. However most states use gross income approaches for the sake of simplicity. Such gross income approaches can generate biases in support awards. Using 2004 tax structures and taking into consideration Earned Income Tax Credit and child tax credit, I estimate the direction, magnitude, and distribution of such biases under three different scenarios of “gross income ” approaches. Results show that these biases can be either positive or negative depending on the particular assumptions made in the gross-to-net income conversion process. In some income combination cases, the biases can be quite substantial. 3

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study I discuss the pros and cons of using net income vs. gross income in gross income-shares states. It is argued that the “standardized net ” approach is the best approach in determining child support awards based on the combined principles of equity and accuracy. However most states use gross income approaches for the sake of simplicity. Such gross income approaches can generate biases in support awards. Using 2004 tax structures and taking into consideration Earned Income Tax Credit and child tax credit, I estimate the direction, magnitude, and distribution of such biases under three different scenarios of “gross income ” approaches. Results show that these biases can be either positive or negative depending on the particular assumptions made in the gross-to-net income conversion process. In some income combination cases, the biases can be quite substantial. 3

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study I discuss the pros and cons of using net income vs. gross income in gross income-shares states. It is argued that the “standardized net ” approach is the best approach in determining child support awards based on the combined principles of equity and accuracy. However most states use gross income approaches for the sake of simplicity. Such gross income approaches can generate biases in support awards. Using 2004 tax structures and taking into consideration Earned Income Tax Credit and child tax credit, I estimate the direction, magnitude, and distribution of such biases under three different scenarios of “gross income ” approaches. Results show that these biases can be either positive or negative depending on the particular assumptions made in the gross-to-net income conversion process. In some income combination cases, the biases can be quite substantial. 3

Key concepts: Gross income, Adjusted gross income, Comprehensive income, Economics, Gross domestic income, Net national income, Net income, Income distribution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Net income, gross income, and bias in child support awards in gross income-shares states — Research Paper | ScholarLens