2015Adelaide law reviewRequires access

What lawyers should 'do' about forensic science evidence

Stephen Odgers

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This article examines what lawyers - and particularly defence lawyers - must do in challenging forensic science evidence. This article argues that for this to occur there must be a significant increase in legal aid funding.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines what lawyers - and particularly defence lawyers - must do in challenging forensic science evidence. This article argues that for this to occur there must be a significant increase in legal aid funding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines what lawyers - and particularly defence lawyers - must do in challenging forensic science evidence. This article argues that for this to occur there must be a significant increase in legal aid funding.

Key concepts: Forensic science, Project commissioning, Publishing, Law, Political science, Federal Rules of Evidence, Engineering ethics, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What lawyers should 'do' about forensic science evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens