ScholarLens Back to search
2014•Evidence-Based PracticeRequires access

Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management

Anne Mounsey

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(4):761–769.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(4):761–769.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(4):761–769.

Key concepts: Expectant management, Induction of labor, Labor induction, Term (time), Medicine, Obstetrics, Preterm labor, Gynecology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management — Research Paper | ScholarLens