2018SIAM Journal on Mathematical AnalysisRequires access

A Canonical Barycenter via Wasserstein Regularization

Young‐Heon Kim, Brendan Pass

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

We introduce a weak notion of barycenter of a probability measure $\mu$ on a metric measure space $(X, d, {\bf m})$, with the metric $d$ and reference measure ${\bf m}$. Under the assumption that all optimal transport plans transporting ${\bf m}$ to any probability measure $\nu$ on $X$ are induced by mappings, we prove that our barycenter $B(\mu)$ is well defined; it is a probability measure on $X$ supported on the set of the usual metric barycenter points of the given measure $\mu$. The definition uses the canonical embedding of the metric space $X$ into its Wasserstein space $P_2(X)$, pushing a given measure $\mu$ forward to a measure on $P_2(X)$. We then regularize the solution to the latter problem by the squared Wasserstein distance to the reference measure ${\bf m}$, and obtain a uniquely defined measure on $X$ supported on the barycentric points of $\mu$. We investigate various properties of $B(\mu)$.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We introduce a weak notion of barycenter of a probability measure $\mu$ on a metric measure space $(X, d, {\bf m})$, with the metric $d$ and reference measure ${\bf m}$. Under the assumption that all optimal transport plans transporting ${\bf m}$ to any probability measure $\nu$ on $X$ are induced by mappings, we prove that our barycenter $B(\mu)$ is well defined; it is a probability measure on $X$ supported on the set of the usual metric barycenter points of the given measure $\mu$. The definition uses the canonical embedding of the metric space $X$ into its Wasserstein space $P_2(X)$, pushing a given measure $\mu$ forward to a measure on $P_2(X)$. We then regularize the solution to the latter problem by the squared Wasserstein distance to the reference measure ${\bf m}$, and obtain a uniquely defined measure on $X$ supported on the barycentric points of $\mu$. We investigate various properties of $B(\mu)$.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We introduce a weak notion of barycenter of a probability measure $\mu$ on a metric measure space $(X, d, {\bf m})$, with the metric $d$ and reference measure ${\bf m}$. Under the assumption that all optimal transport plans transporting ${\bf m}$ to any probability measure $\nu$ on $X$ are induced by mappings, we prove that our barycenter $B(\mu)$ is well defined; it is a probability measure on $X$ supported on the set of the usual metric barycenter points of the given measure $\mu$. The definition uses the canonical embedding of the metric space $X$ into its Wasserstein space $P_2(X)$, pushing a given measure $\mu$ forward to a measure on $P_2(X)$. We then regularize the solution to the latter problem by the squared Wasserstein distance to the reference measure ${\bf m}$, and obtain a uniquely defined measure on $X$ supported on the barycentric points of $\mu$. We investigate various properties of $B(\mu)$.

Key concepts: Probability measure, Measure (data warehouse), Mathematics, Discrete measure, Wasserstein metric, Metric (unit), Metric space, Space (punctuation)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Canonical Barycenter via Wasserstein Regularization — Research Paper | ScholarLens