2017•NeuroreportRequires access

The effects of patterned electrical stimulation combined with voluntary contraction on spinal reciprocal inhibition in healthy individuals

Yoko Kobayashi Takahashi, Toshiyuki Fujiwara, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Michiyuki Kawakami, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Meigen Liu

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of voluntary contraction (VC) on the modulation of reciprocal inhibition induced by patterned electrical stimulation (PES) in healthy individuals. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this study. PES was applied to the common peroneal nerve with a train of 10 pulses at 100 Hz every 2 s for 20 min. VC comprised repetitive ankle dorsiflexion at a frequency of 0.5 Hz for 20 min. All participants performed the following three tasks: (i) VC alone, (ii) PES alone, and (iii) PES combined with VC (PES+VC). Reciprocal inhibition was assessed using a soleus H-reflex conditioning-test paradigm at the time points of before, immediately after, 10 min after, 20 min after, and 30 min after the tasks. PES+VC increased the amount of reciprocal inhibition, with after-effects lasting up to 20 min. PES alone increased reciprocal inhibition and maintained the after-effects on reciprocal inhibition for 10 min, whereas VC alone increased only immediately after the task. VC could modulate the plastic changes in spinal reciprocal inhibition induced by PES in healthy individuals. PES combined with VC has a potential to modulate impaired reciprocal inhibition and it may facilitate functional recovery and improve locomotion after central nervous system lesions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of voluntary contraction (VC) on the modulation of reciprocal inhibition induced by patterned electrical stimulation (PES) in healthy individuals. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this study. PES was applied to the common peroneal nerve with a train of 10 pulses at 100 Hz every 2 s for 20 min. VC comprised repetitive ankle dorsiflexion at a frequency of 0.5 Hz for 20 min. All participants performed the following three tasks: (i) VC alone, (ii) PES alone, and (iii) PES combined with VC (PES+VC). Reciprocal inhibition was assessed using a soleus H-reflex conditioning-test paradigm at the time points of before, immediately after, 10 min after, 20 min after, and 30 min after the tasks. PES+VC increased the amount of reciprocal inhibition, with after-effects lasting up to 20 min. PES alone increased reciprocal inhibition and maintained the after-effects on reciprocal inhibition for 10 min, whereas VC alone increased only immediately after the task. VC could modulate the plastic changes in spinal reciprocal inhibition induced by PES in healthy individuals. PES combined with VC has a potential to modulate impaired reciprocal inhibition and it may facilitate functional recovery and improve locomotion after central nervous system lesions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of voluntary contraction (VC) on the modulation of reciprocal inhibition induced by patterned electrical stimulation (PES) in healthy individuals. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this study. PES was applied to the common peroneal nerve with a train of 10 pulses at 100 Hz every 2 s for 20 min. VC comprised repetitive ankle dorsiflexion at a frequency of 0.5 Hz for 20 min. All participants performed the following three tasks: (i) VC alone, (ii) PES alone, and (iii) PES combined with VC (PES+VC). Reciprocal inhibition was assessed using a soleus H-reflex conditioning-test paradigm at the time points of before, immediately after, 10 min after, 20 min after, and 30 min after the tasks. PES+VC increased the amount of reciprocal inhibition, with after-effects lasting up to 20 min. PES alone increased reciprocal inhibition and maintained the after-effects on reciprocal inhibition for 10 min, whereas VC alone increased only immediately after the task. VC could modulate the plastic changes in spinal reciprocal inhibition induced by PES in healthy individuals. PES combined with VC has a potential to modulate impaired reciprocal inhibition and it may facilitate functional recovery and improve locomotion after central nervous system lesions.

Key concepts: Reciprocal inhibition, H-reflex, Stimulation, Common peroneal nerve, Ankle dorsiflexion, Central nervous system, Psychology, Contraction (grammar)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effects of patterned electrical stimulation combined with voluntary contraction on spinal reciprocal inhibition in healthy individuals — Research Paper | ScholarLens