1914Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University)Open access

Sulfofication in Soils

P. E. Brown, Edmund H. Kellogg

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Sulfur has long been known to be one of the essential plant food constituents. It has always been believed, however, that there was sufficient present in all soils for optimum crop production. This assumption has been very largely based on Wolff’s analyses of the ash of various crops which showed the presence of very small amounts of sulfur. Several investigators have found a considerable loss of sulfur upon ignition of plants for ash determinations, and recently Hart and Peterson, of Wisconsin, pointed out definitely the inaccuracy of determining the total sulfur of plant tissues by examinations of the ash. They analyzed numerous feeding stuffs for total sulfur, using the Osborn method, and compared their results with the earlier analyses of Wolff. This comparison showed quite conclusively that a large proportion of the sulfur in crops is lost upon ignition. It is evident, therefore, that considerably larger amounts of sulfur are removed from soils by common farm crops than has been supposed.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sulfur has long been known to be one of the essential plant food constituents. It has always been believed, however, that there was sufficient present in all soils for optimum crop production. This assumption has been very largely based on Wolff’s analyses of the ash of various crops which showed the presence of very small amounts of sulfur. Several investigators have found a considerable loss of sulfur upon ignition of plants for ash determinations, and recently Hart and Peterson, of Wisconsin, pointed out definitely the inaccuracy of determining the total sulfur of plant tissues by examinations of the ash. They analyzed numerous feeding stuffs for total sulfur, using the Osborn method, and compared their results with the earlier analyses of Wolff. This comparison showed quite conclusively that a large proportion of the sulfur in crops is lost upon ignition. It is evident, therefore, that considerably larger amounts of sulfur are removed from soils by common farm crops than has been supposed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sulfur has long been known to be one of the essential plant food constituents. It has always been believed, however, that there was sufficient present in all soils for optimum crop production. This assumption has been very largely based on Wolff’s analyses of the ash of various crops which showed the presence of very small amounts of sulfur. Several investigators have found a considerable loss of sulfur upon ignition of plants for ash determinations, and recently Hart and Peterson, of Wisconsin, pointed out definitely the inaccuracy of determining the total sulfur of plant tissues by examinations of the ash. They analyzed numerous feeding stuffs for total sulfur, using the Osborn method, and compared their results with the earlier analyses of Wolff. This comparison showed quite conclusively that a large proportion of the sulfur in crops is lost upon ignition. It is evident, therefore, that considerably larger amounts of sulfur are removed from soils by common farm crops than has been supposed.

Key concepts: Soil water, Environmental science, Soil science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sulfofication in Soils — Research Paper | ScholarLens