1998•PubMedRequires access

Hemoglobin and hematocrit: an analysis of clinical accuracy. Case study of the anemic patient.

Marcia L. Keen

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) are often used interchangeably to evaluate anemia in dialysis patients. Hgb is the preferred method in most European countries, while Hct is generally used by clinicians in the United States. This article examines the comparative accuracy of these two values, including a same-patient assessment of laboratory samples. These data illustrate that Hgb is a more accurate method of assessing anemia. Using Hgb may help nurses and patients by: (a) decreasing variability in laboratory assessment, (b) avoiding ongoing errors in anemia measurement, (c) decreasing the nursing time spent on anemia management, and (d) increasing the potential for patients remaining in the recommended DOQI target Hgb range of 11 g/dL to 12 g/dL.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) are often used interchangeably to evaluate anemia in dialysis patients. Hgb is the preferred method in most European countries, while Hct is generally used by clinicians in the United States. This article examines the comparative accuracy of these two values, including a same-patient assessment of laboratory samples. These data illustrate that Hgb is a more accurate method of assessing anemia. Using Hgb may help nurses and patients by: (a) decreasing variability in laboratory assessment, (b) avoiding ongoing errors in anemia measurement, (c) decreasing the nursing time spent on anemia management, and (d) increasing the potential for patients remaining in the recommended DOQI target Hgb range of 11 g/dL to 12 g/dL.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) are often used interchangeably to evaluate anemia in dialysis patients. Hgb is the preferred method in most European countries, while Hct is generally used by clinicians in the United States. This article examines the comparative accuracy of these two values, including a same-patient assessment of laboratory samples. These data illustrate that Hgb is a more accurate method of assessing anemia. Using Hgb may help nurses and patients by: (a) decreasing variability in laboratory assessment, (b) avoiding ongoing errors in anemia measurement, (c) decreasing the nursing time spent on anemia management, and (d) increasing the potential for patients remaining in the recommended DOQI target Hgb range of 11 g/dL to 12 g/dL.

Key concepts: Hematocrit, Anemia, Hemoglobin, Medicine, Target range, Dialysis, Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hemoglobin and hematocrit: an analysis of clinical accuracy. Case study of the anemic patient. — Research Paper | ScholarLens