1986PubMedRequires access

[Incidence of occult lumbro-sacral spina bifida in parents of children with spina bifida (concerning 80 pairs of parents with affected children)].

Anne‐Elie Carsin, Hubert Journel, M. Roussey, B. Le Marec

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Authors examined 80 pairs of parents with affected children with spina-bifida. They compared the incidence of spina-bifida occulta in parents and in 211 controls. The conclusion is: there is no increased incidence of spina-bifida occulta in parents of spina-bifida.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Authors examined 80 pairs of parents with affected children with spina-bifida. They compared the incidence of spina-bifida occulta in parents and in 211 controls. The conclusion is: there is no increased incidence of spina-bifida occulta in parents of spina-bifida.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Authors examined 80 pairs of parents with affected children with spina-bifida. They compared the incidence of spina-bifida occulta in parents and in 211 controls. The conclusion is: there is no increased incidence of spina-bifida occulta in parents of spina-bifida.

Key concepts: Spina bifida, Spina bifida occulta, Incidence (geometry), Medicine, Pediatrics, Occult, Pathology, Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Incidence of occult lumbro-sacral spina bifida in parents of children with spina bifida (concerning 80 pairs of parents with affected children)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens