2016•Third sector reviewRequires access

Third sector review 21st birthday reflection

Rosemary J. Leonard, Ruth Phillips

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this reflection on the 21 years of Third Sector Review we note the growth of the journal and the nature of the research. It is multi-disciplinary, as many disciplines contribute, interdisciplinary, as research concepts and findings combine disciplines, and transdisciplinary, in that research often originates beyond the academy. These qualities, along with our regional focus, have made it difficult for the journal to gain a high ranking. However, we argue that these qualities are necessary. Being regional means recognising context and avoiding claims of universality, but it does not mean being isolated from the international flow of ideas. Ultimately, 'making a difference' through research means being relevant and authoritative and focusing the most useful methods and theories to address the challenges faced by our sector.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this reflection on the 21 years of Third Sector Review we note the growth of the journal and the nature of the research. It is multi-disciplinary, as many disciplines contribute, interdisciplinary, as research concepts and findings combine disciplines, and transdisciplinary, in that research often originates beyond the academy. These qualities, along with our regional focus, have made it difficult for the journal to gain a high ranking. However, we argue that these qualities are necessary. Being regional means recognising context and avoiding claims of universality, but it does not mean being isolated from the international flow of ideas. Ultimately, 'making a difference' through research means being relevant and authoritative and focusing the most useful methods and theories to address the challenges faced by our sector.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this reflection on the 21 years of Third Sector Review we note the growth of the journal and the nature of the research. It is multi-disciplinary, as many disciplines contribute, interdisciplinary, as research concepts and findings combine disciplines, and transdisciplinary, in that research often originates beyond the academy. These qualities, along with our regional focus, have made it difficult for the journal to gain a high ranking. However, we argue that these qualities are necessary. Being regional means recognising context and avoiding claims of universality, but it does not mean being isolated from the international flow of ideas. Ultimately, 'making a difference' through research means being relevant and authoritative and focusing the most useful methods and theories to address the challenges faced by our sector.

Key concepts: Discipline, Engineering ethics, Epistemology, Context (archaeology), Sociology, Reflection (computer programming), Universality (dynamical systems), Critical reflection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Third sector review 21st birthday reflection — Research Paper | ScholarLens