2014Journal of Clinical OncologyRequires access

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, breast MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.

Hee‐Chul Shin, Hee Sung Kim, Sung Jun Park

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

e12023 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US), breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Methods: Between 2012 and 2013, 180 breast cancer patients received curative breast cancer surgery. Preoperative ultrasonography, breast MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were performed. Complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed when a metastatic lymph node was detected preoperatively or intra-operatively. Results: Among 180 patients, 53 patients (31.1%) had axillary metastatic lymph node. The sensitivity of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis was 55% for US, 72% for MRI, and 44%, respectively. The specificity of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis was 88%, 78%, and 92%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis were 67%, 60%, and 71%, respectively, and 81%, 86%, and 79%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, pathologic lymph node metastasis was associated with positive finding for axillary metastasis of US, MRI, and PET/CT, independently (P = 0.028, P = 0.03, and P = 0.017, respectively). With the combining three modalities, scoring system for detecting axillary lymph node metastasis was developed and the AUC for positive lymph node metastasis was 0.811 (95% CI, 0.737 - 0.886). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of US, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were similar. However, combining three imaging modalities could increase the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node metastasis, preoperatively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

e12023 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US), breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Methods: Between 2012 and 2013, 180 breast cancer patients received curative breast cancer surgery. Preoperative ultrasonography, breast MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were performed. Complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed when a metastatic lymph node was detected preoperatively or intra-operatively. Results: Among 180 patients, 53 patients (31.1%) had axillary metastatic lymph node. The sensitivity of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis was 55% for US, 72% for MRI, and 44%, respectively. The specificity of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis was 88%, 78%, and 92%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis were 67%, 60%, and 71%, respectively, and 81%, 86%, and 79%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, pathologic lymph node metastasis was associated with positive finding for axillary metastasis of US, MRI, and PET/CT, independently (P = 0.028, P = 0.03, and P = 0.017, respectively). With the combining three modalities, scoring system for detecting axillary lymph node metastasis was developed and the AUC for positive lymph node metastasis was 0.811 (95% CI, 0.737 - 0.886). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of US, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were similar. However, combining three imaging modalities could increase the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node metastasis, preoperatively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

e12023 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US), breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Methods: Between 2012 and 2013, 180 breast cancer patients received curative breast cancer surgery. Preoperative ultrasonography, breast MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were performed. Complete axillary lymph node dissection was performed when a metastatic lymph node was detected preoperatively or intra-operatively. Results: Among 180 patients, 53 patients (31.1%) had axillary metastatic lymph node. The sensitivity of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis was 55% for US, 72% for MRI, and 44%, respectively. The specificity of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis was 88%, 78%, and 92%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of US, MRI, and PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis were 67%, 60%, and 71%, respectively, and 81%, 86%, and 79%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, pathologic lymph node metastasis was associated with positive finding for axillary metastasis of US, MRI, and PET/CT, independently (P = 0.028, P = 0.03, and P = 0.017, respectively). With the combining three modalities, scoring system for detecting axillary lymph node metastasis was developed and the AUC for positive lymph node metastasis was 0.811 (95% CI, 0.737 - 0.886). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of US, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT were similar. However, combining three imaging modalities could increase the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node metastasis, preoperatively.

Key concepts: Medicine, Breast cancer, Radiology, Lymph node, Magnetic resonance imaging, Metastasis, Positron emission tomography, Axillary lymph nodes

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, breast MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. — Research Paper | ScholarLens