2017New Literary HistoryRequires access

Symbol and Allegory in Romantic History

Nicholas Carr

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The “debate” (as it has come to be called) between symbol and allegory has had two lives. For the Romantics, who inaugurated the distinction in its modern form, the symbol was the hallowed device, its superiority lying in those well-known Romantic preferences for the organic, the infinite, and the imagination. These, of course, and therefore the symbol, too, expressed Romanticism’s protest against a reality that it saw as constraining and instrumental. But whereas the Romantics’ interest in the symbol derived from what was, to them, its essentially antimodern significance, the re-emergence of the symbol-allegory debate has taken place under the aegis of an avowed modernity and postmodernity. As is well known, in this firmament the names of Walter Benjamin and Paul de Man serve as the lodestars of a new appreciation for allegory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The “debate” (as it has come to be called) between symbol and allegory has had two lives. For the Romantics, who inaugurated the distinction in its modern form, the symbol was the hallowed device, its superiority lying in those well-known Romantic preferences for the organic, the infinite, and the imagination. These, of course, and therefore the symbol, too, expressed Romanticism’s protest against a reality that it saw as constraining and instrumental. But whereas the Romantics’ interest in the symbol derived from what was, to them, its essentially antimodern significance, the re-emergence of the symbol-allegory debate has taken place under the aegis of an avowed modernity and postmodernity. As is well known, in this firmament the names of Walter Benjamin and Paul de Man serve as the lodestars of a new appreciation for allegory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The “debate” (as it has come to be called) between symbol and allegory has had two lives. For the Romantics, who inaugurated the distinction in its modern form, the symbol was the hallowed device, its superiority lying in those well-known Romantic preferences for the organic, the infinite, and the imagination. These, of course, and therefore the symbol, too, expressed Romanticism’s protest against a reality that it saw as constraining and instrumental. But whereas the Romantics’ interest in the symbol derived from what was, to them, its essentially antimodern significance, the re-emergence of the symbol-allegory debate has taken place under the aegis of an avowed modernity and postmodernity. As is well known, in this firmament the names of Walter Benjamin and Paul de Man serve as the lodestars of a new appreciation for allegory.

Key concepts: Allegory, Symbol (formal), Romanticism, Romance, Literature, Philosophy, Modernity, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Symbol and Allegory in Romantic History — Research Paper | ScholarLens