2015•Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Organizational Identity Work in an Emerging Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Network

Fernando F. Fachin, Ann Langley

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore real-time and naturally-occurring processes of emergence of organizational identity from inception. While previous studies provide insights into broader phases associated with identity formation, they do not reveal the potentially more contentious dynamics that are likely to have preceded or underpinned it. With a focus on organizational identity formation in the everyday, this study analyzes 9000 collective e-mails exchanged over four years since the foundation of an organization in the field of open-source hardware. Our study identifies three types of discursive organizational identity work engaged in by members through their interactions, that we call ideological, practice, and boundary work. We show how through their organizational identity work, members continually struggle to reconcile conflicting value commitments with pragmatic concerns about the sustainability of the organization. We argue that while organizational identity is about shared understandings, the capacity of organizational members to develop shared understanding about identity is paradoxically founded on their ongoing everyday confrontations with the tensions underlying it.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to explore real-time and naturally-occurring processes of emergence of organizational identity from inception. While previous studies provide insights into broader phases associated with identity formation, they do not reveal the potentially more contentious dynamics that are likely to have preceded or underpinned it. With a focus on organizational identity formation in the everyday, this study analyzes 9000 collective e-mails exchanged over four years since the foundation of an organization in the field of open-source hardware. Our study identifies three types of discursive organizational identity work engaged in by members through their interactions, that we call ideological, practice, and boundary work. We show how through their organizational identity work, members continually struggle to reconcile conflicting value commitments with pragmatic concerns about the sustainability of the organization. We argue that while organizational identity is about shared understandings, the capacity of organizational members to develop shared understanding about identity is paradoxically founded on their ongoing everyday confrontations with the tensions underlying it.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore real-time and naturally-occurring processes of emergence of organizational identity from inception. While previous studies provide insights into broader phases associated with identity formation, they do not reveal the potentially more contentious dynamics that are likely to have preceded or underpinned it. With a focus on organizational identity formation in the everyday, this study analyzes 9000 collective e-mails exchanged over four years since the foundation of an organization in the field of open-source hardware. Our study identifies three types of discursive organizational identity work engaged in by members through their interactions, that we call ideological, practice, and boundary work. We show how through their organizational identity work, members continually struggle to reconcile conflicting value commitments with pragmatic concerns about the sustainability of the organization. We argue that while organizational identity is about shared understandings, the capacity of organizational members to develop shared understanding about identity is paradoxically founded on their ongoing everyday confrontations with the tensions underlying it.

Key concepts: Organizational identity, Identity (music), Public relations, Organizational field, Sociology, Ideology, Organizational learning, Social identity approach

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organizational Identity Work in an Emerging Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Network — Research Paper | ScholarLens