2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Leisure in China

Honggen Xiao

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Much research has been conducted into the nature and significance of leisure. Although leisure is popularly thought of as the opposite of work, it is generally defined in terms of “freedom from constraint,” “time left over after worK,” or “free time after obligatory social duties have been met” (Torkildsen, 1992:25). However, according to Parry, leisure as a social phenomenon involves social constraint and social obligation and can best be thought of as being embodied in a whole way of life. Such an idea of leisure even invokes the concept of culture (Parry and Parry, 1977). The complexity and diversity of leisure are also illustrated by Kaplan, who, from a sociological point of view, argued that “nothing is definable as leisure per se and almost anything is definable as leisure, given a synthesis of elements” (Kaplan, 1975:19).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Much research has been conducted into the nature and significance of leisure. Although leisure is popularly thought of as the opposite of work, it is generally defined in terms of “freedom from constraint,” “time left over after worK,” or “free time after obligatory social duties have been met” (Torkildsen, 1992:25). However, according to Parry, leisure as a social phenomenon involves social constraint and social obligation and can best be thought of as being embodied in a whole way of life. Such an idea of leisure even invokes the concept of culture (Parry and Parry, 1977). The complexity and diversity of leisure are also illustrated by Kaplan, who, from a sociological point of view, argued that “nothing is definable as leisure per se and almost anything is definable as leisure, given a synthesis of elements” (Kaplan, 1975:19).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Much research has been conducted into the nature and significance of leisure. Although leisure is popularly thought of as the opposite of work, it is generally defined in terms of “freedom from constraint,” “time left over after worK,” or “free time after obligatory social duties have been met” (Torkildsen, 1992:25). However, according to Parry, leisure as a social phenomenon involves social constraint and social obligation and can best be thought of as being embodied in a whole way of life. Such an idea of leisure even invokes the concept of culture (Parry and Parry, 1977). The complexity and diversity of leisure are also illustrated by Kaplan, who, from a sociological point of view, argued that “nothing is definable as leisure per se and almost anything is definable as leisure, given a synthesis of elements” (Kaplan, 1975:19).

Key concepts: China, Business, Geography, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Leisure in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens