2017•Unpublished venueOpen access

Extracting executable transformations from distilled code changes

Reinout Stevens, Coen De Roover

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Change distilling algorithms compute a sequence of fine-grained changes that, when executed in order, transform a given source AST into a given target AST. The resulting change sequences are used in the field of mining software repositories to study source code evolution. Unfortunately, detecting and specifying source code evolutions in such a change sequence is cumbersome. We therefore introduce a tool-supported approach that identifies minimal executable subsequences in a sequence of distilled changes that implement a particular evolution pattern, specified in terms of intermediate states of the AST that undergoes each change. This enables users to describe the effect of multiple changes, irrespective of their execution order, while ensuring that different change sequences that implement the same code evolution are recalled. Correspondingly, our evaluation is two-fold. Using examples, we demonstrate the expressiveness of specifying source code evolutions through intermediate ASTs. We also show that our approach is able to recall different implementation variants of the same source code evolution in open-source histories.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Change distilling algorithms compute a sequence of fine-grained changes that, when executed in order, transform a given source AST into a given target AST. The resulting change sequences are used in the field of mining software repositories to study source code evolution. Unfortunately, detecting and specifying source code evolutions in such a change sequence is cumbersome. We therefore introduce a tool-supported approach that identifies minimal executable subsequences in a sequence of distilled changes that implement a particular evolution pattern, specified in terms of intermediate states of the AST that undergoes each change. This enables users to describe the effect of multiple changes, irrespective of their execution order, while ensuring that different change sequences that implement the same code evolution are recalled. Correspondingly, our evaluation is two-fold. Using examples, we demonstrate the expressiveness of specifying source code evolutions through intermediate ASTs. We also show that our approach is able to recall different implementation variants of the same source code evolution in open-source histories.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Change distilling algorithms compute a sequence of fine-grained changes that, when executed in order, transform a given source AST into a given target AST. The resulting change sequences are used in the field of mining software repositories to study source code evolution. Unfortunately, detecting and specifying source code evolutions in such a change sequence is cumbersome. We therefore introduce a tool-supported approach that identifies minimal executable subsequences in a sequence of distilled changes that implement a particular evolution pattern, specified in terms of intermediate states of the AST that undergoes each change. This enables users to describe the effect of multiple changes, irrespective of their execution order, while ensuring that different change sequences that implement the same code evolution are recalled. Correspondingly, our evaluation is two-fold. Using examples, we demonstrate the expressiveness of specifying source code evolutions through intermediate ASTs. We also show that our approach is able to recall different implementation variants of the same source code evolution in open-source histories.

Key concepts: Executable, Source code, Computer science, Sequence (biology), Software evolution, Code (set theory), Programming language, Field (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Extracting executable transformations from distilled code changes — Research Paper | ScholarLens