2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance comparison of TCP, UDP and SCTP in a wired network

D. Madhuri, P. Chenna Reddy

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a transport protocol, like TCP and UDP. SCTP provides different services like connection orientation, reliability, end-to-end communication, flow control and congestion control. SCTP has unique quality such as multi-streaming and multi-homing which are not present in traditional transport protocols. The current transport protocols are not enough to meet the requirements of multimedia. New protocols like SCTP are being developed in order to cope up with emerging applications like multimedia. In this paper performance comparison of TCP, UDP and SCTP is done in a wired network. In order to identify the limitations of the three transport protocols in wired network and to understand the scope for improvement is the main purpose of this paper. The performance is analyzed using the metrics Packet Loss Rate (PLR), Jitter, End-to-End Delay (ETE Delay), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput and Fairness. Ns-2.35 is used as a simulator.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a transport protocol, like TCP and UDP. SCTP provides different services like connection orientation, reliability, end-to-end communication, flow control and congestion control. SCTP has unique quality such as multi-streaming and multi-homing which are not present in traditional transport protocols. The current transport protocols are not enough to meet the requirements of multimedia. New protocols like SCTP are being developed in order to cope up with emerging applications like multimedia. In this paper performance comparison of TCP, UDP and SCTP is done in a wired network. In order to identify the limitations of the three transport protocols in wired network and to understand the scope for improvement is the main purpose of this paper. The performance is analyzed using the metrics Packet Loss Rate (PLR), Jitter, End-to-End Delay (ETE Delay), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput and Fairness. Ns-2.35 is used as a simulator.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a transport protocol, like TCP and UDP. SCTP provides different services like connection orientation, reliability, end-to-end communication, flow control and congestion control. SCTP has unique quality such as multi-streaming and multi-homing which are not present in traditional transport protocols. The current transport protocols are not enough to meet the requirements of multimedia. New protocols like SCTP are being developed in order to cope up with emerging applications like multimedia. In this paper performance comparison of TCP, UDP and SCTP is done in a wired network. In order to identify the limitations of the three transport protocols in wired network and to understand the scope for improvement is the main purpose of this paper. The performance is analyzed using the metrics Packet Loss Rate (PLR), Jitter, End-to-End Delay (ETE Delay), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), Throughput and Fairness. Ns-2.35 is used as a simulator.

Key concepts: Stream Control Transmission Protocol, Computer network, Computer science, Multihoming, Network packet, Transmission Control Protocol, User Datagram Protocol, TCP acceleration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance comparison of TCP, UDP and SCTP in a wired network — Research Paper | ScholarLens