2014•Hart Publishing eBooksRequires access

Corporate Criminal Liability : The Influence of Corporate Culture

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter investigates corporate criminal liability in Australia, where the law has been reformed at the Commonwealth level under Australia’s Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) but has yet to be substantively implemented by most States and Territories. Described as ‘arguably the most sophisticated model of corporate criminal liability in the world’, the Criminal Code addresses the fault elements of an offence through notions of organisational blameworthiness, taking into account such factors as the corporation’s culture, systems and operating policies. Consideration of corporate culture at the liability stage extends the breadth of Australia’s corporate liability regime far beyond any other jurisdiction. In doing so, it incentivises corporate self-monitoring and the development of a general culture of compliance as a failure to do so increases the risk of prosecution. However, theoretical promise has yet to translate into practice and the provisions remain untested in a criminal prosecution. This chapter traces the theoretical development of corporate criminal liability under the common law, from derivative to holistic models; considers the operation of the corporate criminal liability provisions under the Criminal Code and the extent to which the provisions address the limitations of the traditional models; and identifies issues that are potentially acting as roadblocks to prosecution based on corporate culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter investigates corporate criminal liability in Australia, where the law has been reformed at the Commonwealth level under Australia’s Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) but has yet to be substantively implemented by most States and Territories. Described as ‘arguably the most sophisticated model of corporate criminal liability in the world’, the Criminal Code addresses the fault elements of an offence through notions of organisational blameworthiness, taking into account such factors as the corporation’s culture, systems and operating policies. Consideration of corporate culture at the liability stage extends the breadth of Australia’s corporate liability regime far beyond any other jurisdiction. In doing so, it incentivises corporate self-monitoring and the development of a general culture of compliance as a failure to do so increases the risk of prosecution. However, theoretical promise has yet to translate into practice and the provisions remain untested in a criminal prosecution. This chapter traces the theoretical development of corporate criminal liability under the common law, from derivative to holistic models; considers the operation of the corporate criminal liability provisions under the Criminal Code and the extent to which the provisions address the limitations of the traditional models; and identifies issues that are potentially acting as roadblocks to prosecution based on corporate culture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter investigates corporate criminal liability in Australia, where the law has been reformed at the Commonwealth level under Australia’s Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) but has yet to be substantively implemented by most States and Territories. Described as ‘arguably the most sophisticated model of corporate criminal liability in the world’, the Criminal Code addresses the fault elements of an offence through notions of organisational blameworthiness, taking into account such factors as the corporation’s culture, systems and operating policies. Consideration of corporate culture at the liability stage extends the breadth of Australia’s corporate liability regime far beyond any other jurisdiction. In doing so, it incentivises corporate self-monitoring and the development of a general culture of compliance as a failure to do so increases the risk of prosecution. However, theoretical promise has yet to translate into practice and the provisions remain untested in a criminal prosecution. This chapter traces the theoretical development of corporate criminal liability under the common law, from derivative to holistic models; considers the operation of the corporate criminal liability provisions under the Criminal Code and the extent to which the provisions address the limitations of the traditional models; and identifies issues that are potentially acting as roadblocks to prosecution based on corporate culture.

Key concepts: Criminal liability, Business, Liability, Corporate liability, Criminology, Law and economics, Criminal law, Accounting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Corporate Criminal Liability : The Influence of Corporate Culture — Research Paper | ScholarLens