2016Tropical AgricultureOpen access

Impact of different periods of weed interference on growth and yield of maize Zea mays L 245

Emmanuel Oyamedan Imoloame, J. O. Omolaiye

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

Field trials were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Kwara State University, Nigeria, during the 2013 and 2014 cropping seasons. The aim was to determine the effect of periods of weed interference on weed infestation, maize growth and yield. The experiment consisted of 10 treatments, namely, plots initially kept weed-free for 3, 6, 9 and 12 Weeks. After Sowing (WAS) and subsequently left weedy until harvest and plots initially left weedy for 3, 6, 9 and 12 Weeks. After Sowing (WAS) and subsequently kept weed-free till harvest. There were two control plots, one left weedy and the other kept weed–free till harvest. The treatments were laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Parameters measured were weed dry weight, maize plant height, leaf area, number of leaves/plant, cob weight, number of kernel rows/cob, 100 seed weight and grain yield. Results show that weed interference in maize for 6WAS and beyond significantly depressed growth parameters and grain yield. Plots which received weed interference for 3WAS produced significantly higher yield which was comparable to the maximum. Therefore, it is understood from the current studies that maize plot be kept weed-free between 3 and 6 WAS which is the critical period of weed interference, in order to get optimal yield.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field trials were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Kwara State University, Nigeria, during the 2013 and 2014 cropping seasons. The aim was to determine the effect of periods of weed interference on weed infestation, maize growth and yield. The experiment consisted of 10 treatments, namely, plots initially kept weed-free for 3, 6, 9 and 12 Weeks. After Sowing (WAS) and subsequently left weedy until harvest and plots initially left weedy for 3, 6, 9 and 12 Weeks. After Sowing (WAS) and subsequently kept weed-free till harvest. There were two control plots, one left weedy and the other kept weed–free till harvest. The treatments were laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Parameters measured were weed dry weight, maize plant height, leaf area, number of leaves/plant, cob weight, number of kernel rows/cob, 100 seed weight and grain yield. Results show that weed interference in maize for 6WAS and beyond significantly depressed growth parameters and grain yield. Plots which received weed interference for 3WAS produced significantly higher yield which was comparable to the maximum. Therefore, it is understood from the current studies that maize plot be kept weed-free between 3 and 6 WAS which is the critical period of weed interference, in order to get optimal yield.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field trials were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Kwara State University, Nigeria, during the 2013 and 2014 cropping seasons. The aim was to determine the effect of periods of weed interference on weed infestation, maize growth and yield. The experiment consisted of 10 treatments, namely, plots initially kept weed-free for 3, 6, 9 and 12 Weeks. After Sowing (WAS) and subsequently left weedy until harvest and plots initially left weedy for 3, 6, 9 and 12 Weeks. After Sowing (WAS) and subsequently kept weed-free till harvest. There were two control plots, one left weedy and the other kept weed–free till harvest. The treatments were laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times. Parameters measured were weed dry weight, maize plant height, leaf area, number of leaves/plant, cob weight, number of kernel rows/cob, 100 seed weight and grain yield. Results show that weed interference in maize for 6WAS and beyond significantly depressed growth parameters and grain yield. Plots which received weed interference for 3WAS produced significantly higher yield which was comparable to the maximum. Therefore, it is understood from the current studies that maize plot be kept weed-free between 3 and 6 WAS which is the critical period of weed interference, in order to get optimal yield.

Key concepts: Weed, Sowing, Agronomy, Dry weight, Weed control, Randomized block design, Zea mays, Yield (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of different periods of weed interference on growth and yield of maize Zea mays L 245 — Research Paper | ScholarLens