2012•Annals of biological researchRequires access

The Effect of Counterbalance Load System on Ground Reaction Force during Walking

Hassan Safikhani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of counterbalance load system on ground reaction force (GRF) during walking on college age students. GRF was recorded with force plate during walking on a treadmill with three different conditions. Twenty-six volunteer (mean age was 22.41±1.75 years) participated in this study. The subjects in three different days walked 10 min on the treadmill without backpack, with normal backpack and with counterbalance backpack. GRF measured during walking with three conditions. The walking and backpack data gathered from these subjects were analyzed using a mix between subjects analysis of variance ANOVA for GRF in three different conditions. The results indicated that, GRF were greater in normal backpack and counterbalance backpack conditions than without backpack condition. But there is significant difference among GRF during walking with normal and counterbalance backpack and unloaded walking. At the four phase of walking all to gather there was significant difference between all conditions. Finding of this investigation clearly show the advantage of a new system for carrying the load that was counterbalance backpack. In addition the reduction of force by counterbalance backpack is kinematic benefit of carrying the load.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study investigated the effect of counterbalance load system on ground reaction force (GRF) during walking on college age students. GRF was recorded with force plate during walking on a treadmill with three different conditions. Twenty-six volunteer (mean age was 22.41±1.75 years) participated in this study. The subjects in three different days walked 10 min on the treadmill without backpack, with normal backpack and with counterbalance backpack. GRF measured during walking with three conditions. The walking and backpack data gathered from these subjects were analyzed using a mix between subjects analysis of variance ANOVA for GRF in three different conditions. The results indicated that, GRF were greater in normal backpack and counterbalance backpack conditions than without backpack condition. But there is significant difference among GRF during walking with normal and counterbalance backpack and unloaded walking. At the four phase of walking all to gather there was significant difference between all conditions. Finding of this investigation clearly show the advantage of a new system for carrying the load that was counterbalance backpack. In addition the reduction of force by counterbalance backpack is kinematic benefit of carrying the load.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study investigated the effect of counterbalance load system on ground reaction force (GRF) during walking on college age students. GRF was recorded with force plate during walking on a treadmill with three different conditions. Twenty-six volunteer (mean age was 22.41±1.75 years) participated in this study. The subjects in three different days walked 10 min on the treadmill without backpack, with normal backpack and with counterbalance backpack. GRF measured during walking with three conditions. The walking and backpack data gathered from these subjects were analyzed using a mix between subjects analysis of variance ANOVA for GRF in three different conditions. The results indicated that, GRF were greater in normal backpack and counterbalance backpack conditions than without backpack condition. But there is significant difference among GRF during walking with normal and counterbalance backpack and unloaded walking. At the four phase of walking all to gather there was significant difference between all conditions. Finding of this investigation clearly show the advantage of a new system for carrying the load that was counterbalance backpack. In addition the reduction of force by counterbalance backpack is kinematic benefit of carrying the load.

Key concepts: Backpack, Ground reaction force, Treadmill, Significant difference, Kinematics, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Analysis of variance, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Counterbalance Load System on Ground Reaction Force during Walking — Research Paper | ScholarLens