2016Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago)Open access

Understanding the role of leadership motivation in college student leadership development

Benjamin P. Correia‐Harker

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Current scholarship situates leadership capacity, leadership self-efficacy, and motivation as core factors in predicting leadership action (Chan & Drasgow, 2001; Dugan, 2017). With relationships between leadership capacity and self-efficacy clearly established in college student leadership development literature (Dugan & Komives, 2007, 2010), this research endeavors to better understand motivation’s role in the student leadership development process. Using Dugan (2017) and Chan and Drasgow’s (2001) theoretical models as guides, this research will examine several models that test various relationships between leadership capacity, self-efficacy, and motivation. Because scholars have emphasized the importance of disaggregating data based on social identities (Kodama & Dugan, 2013), I will also explore the nature of these various relationships across race, gender, and sexual orientation. In better comprehending the nature of motivation’s role in student leadership development, researchers and practitioners can understand to what degree leadership motivation influences the developmental process, potentially explore factors that bolster leadership motivation, and integrate environmental interventions that leverage motivation in the leadership development process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Current scholarship situates leadership capacity, leadership self-efficacy, and motivation as core factors in predicting leadership action (Chan & Drasgow, 2001; Dugan, 2017). With relationships between leadership capacity and self-efficacy clearly established in college student leadership development literature (Dugan & Komives, 2007, 2010), this research endeavors to better understand motivation’s role in the student leadership development process. Using Dugan (2017) and Chan and Drasgow’s (2001) theoretical models as guides, this research will examine several models that test various relationships between leadership capacity, self-efficacy, and motivation. Because scholars have emphasized the importance of disaggregating data based on social identities (Kodama & Dugan, 2013), I will also explore the nature of these various relationships across race, gender, and sexual orientation. In better comprehending the nature of motivation’s role in student leadership development, researchers and practitioners can understand to what degree leadership motivation influences the developmental process, potentially explore factors that bolster leadership motivation, and integrate environmental interventions that leverage motivation in the leadership development process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Current scholarship situates leadership capacity, leadership self-efficacy, and motivation as core factors in predicting leadership action (Chan & Drasgow, 2001; Dugan, 2017). With relationships between leadership capacity and self-efficacy clearly established in college student leadership development literature (Dugan & Komives, 2007, 2010), this research endeavors to better understand motivation’s role in the student leadership development process. Using Dugan (2017) and Chan and Drasgow’s (2001) theoretical models as guides, this research will examine several models that test various relationships between leadership capacity, self-efficacy, and motivation. Because scholars have emphasized the importance of disaggregating data based on social identities (Kodama & Dugan, 2013), I will also explore the nature of these various relationships across race, gender, and sexual orientation. In better comprehending the nature of motivation’s role in student leadership development, researchers and practitioners can understand to what degree leadership motivation influences the developmental process, potentially explore factors that bolster leadership motivation, and integrate environmental interventions that leverage motivation in the leadership development process.

Key concepts: Leadership development, Psychology, Leadership style, Shared leadership, Leadership, Transactional leadership, Public relations, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Understanding the role of leadership motivation in college student leadership development — Research Paper | ScholarLens