1982American MineralogistRequires access

Electron microscopy of a muscovite–biotite interface

Sumio Iijima, Jing Zhu

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

An intergrowth of muscovite and biotite from Mitchell Creek Mine, Upson County, Georgia, was studied with a high resolution transmission electron microscope. Atomic arrangements of the interface between muscovite and biotite have been derived, revealing far more complexity for the interface structure than that proposed previously based on optical and X-ray analysis (Gresens and Stensrud, 1971). It was found that the muscovite has an almost perfectly ordered 2M 1 structure, while the biotite is highly disordered. Despite such disorder in biotite, both octahedral layers and K ion interlayers of the two minerals are connected perfectly at the interface, while about 60% of the tetrahedral sheets are discontinued across the interface. Occasional occurrences of coherent intergrowths of chlorite-like structure in biotite were recognized in the vicinity of the interface.--Journal abstract.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An intergrowth of muscovite and biotite from Mitchell Creek Mine, Upson County, Georgia, was studied with a high resolution transmission electron microscope. Atomic arrangements of the interface between muscovite and biotite have been derived, revealing far more complexity for the interface structure than that proposed previously based on optical and X-ray analysis (Gresens and Stensrud, 1971). It was found that the muscovite has an almost perfectly ordered 2M 1 structure, while the biotite is highly disordered. Despite such disorder in biotite, both octahedral layers and K ion interlayers of the two minerals are connected perfectly at the interface, while about 60% of the tetrahedral sheets are discontinued across the interface. Occasional occurrences of coherent intergrowths of chlorite-like structure in biotite were recognized in the vicinity of the interface.--Journal abstract.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An intergrowth of muscovite and biotite from Mitchell Creek Mine, Upson County, Georgia, was studied with a high resolution transmission electron microscope. Atomic arrangements of the interface between muscovite and biotite have been derived, revealing far more complexity for the interface structure than that proposed previously based on optical and X-ray analysis (Gresens and Stensrud, 1971). It was found that the muscovite has an almost perfectly ordered 2M 1 structure, while the biotite is highly disordered. Despite such disorder in biotite, both octahedral layers and K ion interlayers of the two minerals are connected perfectly at the interface, while about 60% of the tetrahedral sheets are discontinued across the interface. Occasional occurrences of coherent intergrowths of chlorite-like structure in biotite were recognized in the vicinity of the interface.--Journal abstract.

Key concepts: Muscovite, Biotite, Chlorite, Crystallography, Transmission electron microscopy, Octahedron, Mineral, Electron microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electron microscopy of a muscovite–biotite interface — Research Paper | ScholarLens