2017SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Retirement Policy Directions in 2017 and Beyond

Stephen Blakely

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

With a new Congress and a new president in Washington, how are U.S. retirement policies likely to change? Possibly quite radically, and for two main reasons. First, because of the new majority’s plans to overhaul the entire U.S. tax structure and federal budget in ways that could fundamentally change how private-sector retirement plans are treated in the tax code. Retirement, as a stand-along issue, is no longer a high legislative priority in Washington. And second, because of the drive to simplify and lower income tax rates, tax-favored retirement provisions in the tax code are vulnerable. As one of the top sources of “revenue foregone” by the federal government, ending or reducing current tax breaks for employment-based retirement plans (particularly 401(k)s) would free up revenue for other things the new Congress and president want to do. These and other issues were discussed at the Employee Benefit Research Institute’s December 2016 policy forum in Washington, DC, which brought together more than a hundred policy experts to discuss “Retirement Policy Directions in 2017 and Beyond.” A panel of 10 specialists, including industry representatives, former government officials, think-tank leaders and EBRI researchers, discussed the state of the U.S. retirement system today and what they think the future is likely to hold. This paper provides a synopsis of the policy forum discussion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With a new Congress and a new president in Washington, how are U.S. retirement policies likely to change? Possibly quite radically, and for two main reasons. First, because of the new majority’s plans to overhaul the entire U.S. tax structure and federal budget in ways that could fundamentally change how private-sector retirement plans are treated in the tax code. Retirement, as a stand-along issue, is no longer a high legislative priority in Washington. And second, because of the drive to simplify and lower income tax rates, tax-favored retirement provisions in the tax code are vulnerable. As one of the top sources of “revenue foregone” by the federal government, ending or reducing current tax breaks for employment-based retirement plans (particularly 401(k)s) would free up revenue for other things the new Congress and president want to do. These and other issues were discussed at the Employee Benefit Research Institute’s December 2016 policy forum in Washington, DC, which brought together more than a hundred policy experts to discuss “Retirement Policy Directions in 2017 and Beyond.” A panel of 10 specialists, including industry representatives, former government officials, think-tank leaders and EBRI researchers, discussed the state of the U.S. retirement system today and what they think the future is likely to hold. This paper provides a synopsis of the policy forum discussion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With a new Congress and a new president in Washington, how are U.S. retirement policies likely to change? Possibly quite radically, and for two main reasons. First, because of the new majority’s plans to overhaul the entire U.S. tax structure and federal budget in ways that could fundamentally change how private-sector retirement plans are treated in the tax code. Retirement, as a stand-along issue, is no longer a high legislative priority in Washington. And second, because of the drive to simplify and lower income tax rates, tax-favored retirement provisions in the tax code are vulnerable. As one of the top sources of “revenue foregone” by the federal government, ending or reducing current tax breaks for employment-based retirement plans (particularly 401(k)s) would free up revenue for other things the new Congress and president want to do. These and other issues were discussed at the Employee Benefit Research Institute’s December 2016 policy forum in Washington, DC, which brought together more than a hundred policy experts to discuss “Retirement Policy Directions in 2017 and Beyond.” A panel of 10 specialists, including industry representatives, former government officials, think-tank leaders and EBRI researchers, discussed the state of the U.S. retirement system today and what they think the future is likely to hold. This paper provides a synopsis of the policy forum discussion.

Key concepts: Legislature, Tax policy, Revenue, Government (linguistics), Tax revenue, State (computer science), Tax reform, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retirement Policy Directions in 2017 and Beyond — Research Paper | ScholarLens