2016publication.editionNameRequires access

A Pipeline for Developing and Testing Staining Protocols for Flow Cytometry, Demonstrated with SYBR Green I and Propidium Iodide Viability Staining

Alīna Neščerecka, Frederik Hammes, Tālis Juhna

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The increasing use of flow cytometry (FCM) for analyses of environmental samples has resulted in a large variety of staining protocols with varying results and limited comparability. Viability assessment with FCM is in this context of particular interest because incorrect staining could severely affect the outcome/interpretation of the results. Here we propose a pipeline for the development and optimization of staining protocols for environmental samples, demonstrated with the common viability dye combination of SYBR Green I (SG) and propidium iodide (PI). Optimization steps included the assessment of dye solvents, determination of suitable PI concentration, and determining the optimal staining temperature and staining time. We demonstrated that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could impair membrane integrity, when used for SGPI stock solution preparation, and TRIS buffer was chosen as an alternative. Moreover we selected 6μM as optimal PI final concentration: less than 3μM resulted in incomplete staining of damaged cells, while concentrations higher that 12μM resulted in false PI-positive staining of intact cells. Low temperatures (25°C) resulted in a slow reaction and did not enable the staining of all bacteria, while high temperatures (44°C) caused damage to cells and false PI-positive results. Hence, 35°C was selected as optimal staining temperature. We further showed that a minimum of 15min were necessary to obtain stable staining results. Moreover, we showed that addition of EDTA resulted in 1-39% more PI-positive results compared to an EDTA-free sample, and argue that insufficient evidence currently exist in favor of adding EDTA to all samples in general. Altogether, the data clearly shows the need to be careful, precise and reproducible when staining cells for flow cytometric analyses, and the need to assess and optimize staining protocols with both viable and non-viable bacteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The increasing use of flow cytometry (FCM) for analyses of environmental samples has resulted in a large variety of staining protocols with varying results and limited comparability. Viability assessment with FCM is in this context of particular interest because incorrect staining could severely affect the outcome/interpretation of the results. Here we propose a pipeline for the development and optimization of staining protocols for environmental samples, demonstrated with the common viability dye combination of SYBR Green I (SG) and propidium iodide (PI). Optimization steps included the assessment of dye solvents, determination of suitable PI concentration, and determining the optimal staining temperature and staining time. We demonstrated that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could impair membrane integrity, when used for SGPI stock solution preparation, and TRIS buffer was chosen as an alternative. Moreover we selected 6μM as optimal PI final concentration: less than 3μM resulted in incomplete staining of damaged cells, while concentrations higher that 12μM resulted in false PI-positive staining of intact cells. Low temperatures (25°C) resulted in a slow reaction and did not enable the staining of all bacteria, while high temperatures (44°C) caused damage to cells and false PI-positive results. Hence, 35°C was selected as optimal staining temperature. We further showed that a minimum of 15min were necessary to obtain stable staining results. Moreover, we showed that addition of EDTA resulted in 1-39% more PI-positive results compared to an EDTA-free sample, and argue that insufficient evidence currently exist in favor of adding EDTA to all samples in general. Altogether, the data clearly shows the need to be careful, precise and reproducible when staining cells for flow cytometric analyses, and the need to assess and optimize staining protocols with both viable and non-viable bacteria.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The increasing use of flow cytometry (FCM) for analyses of environmental samples has resulted in a large variety of staining protocols with varying results and limited comparability. Viability assessment with FCM is in this context of particular interest because incorrect staining could severely affect the outcome/interpretation of the results. Here we propose a pipeline for the development and optimization of staining protocols for environmental samples, demonstrated with the common viability dye combination of SYBR Green I (SG) and propidium iodide (PI). Optimization steps included the assessment of dye solvents, determination of suitable PI concentration, and determining the optimal staining temperature and staining time. We demonstrated that dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could impair membrane integrity, when used for SGPI stock solution preparation, and TRIS buffer was chosen as an alternative. Moreover we selected 6μM as optimal PI final concentration: less than 3μM resulted in incomplete staining of damaged cells, while concentrations higher that 12μM resulted in false PI-positive staining of intact cells. Low temperatures (25°C) resulted in a slow reaction and did not enable the staining of all bacteria, while high temperatures (44°C) caused damage to cells and false PI-positive results. Hence, 35°C was selected as optimal staining temperature. We further showed that a minimum of 15min were necessary to obtain stable staining results. Moreover, we showed that addition of EDTA resulted in 1-39% more PI-positive results compared to an EDTA-free sample, and argue that insufficient evidence currently exist in favor of adding EDTA to all samples in general. Altogether, the data clearly shows the need to be careful, precise and reproducible when staining cells for flow cytometric analyses, and the need to assess and optimize staining protocols with both viable and non-viable bacteria.

Key concepts: Staining, Propidium iodide, Flow cytometry, SYBR Green I, Molecular biology, Chemistry, Biology, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Pipeline for Developing and Testing Staining Protocols for Flow Cytometry, Demonstrated with SYBR Green I and Propidium Iodide Viability Staining — Research Paper | ScholarLens