2017Journal of Digestive DiseasesOpen access

Physiological study of the anorectal reflex in patients with functional anorectal and defecation disorders

Kumaran Thiruppathy, John Mason, Khalid Akbari, Amanda Raeburn, Anton Emmanuel

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fecal incontinence (FI) and constipation can arise from a variety of alterations of anorectal function. This study aimed to investigate the components of the anorecal reflex in patients with these symptoms and to determine the functional significance of various physiological parameters. METHODS: Altogether 21 healthy volunteers (controls) and 78 FI-predominant and 74 constipation-predominant patients were recruited and administered Wexner incontinence and constipation questionnaires. All participants underwent standardized anorectal physiology assessments. RESULTS: O, P < 0.05). Patients with urge FI had lower maximal tolerable volumes (100 mL vs 166 mL, P < 0.05). Patients with slow-transit constipation had elevated rectal electrosensitivity thresholds compared with controls (31.4 mA vs 20.2 mA, P < 0.05), and rectal mucosal blood flow than patients with evacuation difficulty and controls (107 vs 162 flux units (FU) [evacuation difficulty] vs 169 FU [controls], P < 0.05). Only patients with passive FI were associated with reflex abnormalities (prolonged recovery phase (1.2 ms vs 0.5 ms, P < 0.05) and total duration of reflex (6.3 ms vs 4.3 ms, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal motor, sensory and reflex abnormalities are seen in distinct patterns in patients with FI and constipation. This would suggest distinct physiological differences that may predict the potential for different neuromodulation treatment and behavioral modalities in these conditions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Fecal incontinence (FI) and constipation can arise from a variety of alterations of anorectal function. This study aimed to investigate the components of the anorecal reflex in patients with these symptoms and to determine the functional significance of various physiological parameters. METHODS: Altogether 21 healthy volunteers (controls) and 78 FI-predominant and 74 constipation-predominant patients were recruited and administered Wexner incontinence and constipation questionnaires. All participants underwent standardized anorectal physiology assessments. RESULTS: O, P < 0.05). Patients with urge FI had lower maximal tolerable volumes (100 mL vs 166 mL, P < 0.05). Patients with slow-transit constipation had elevated rectal electrosensitivity thresholds compared with controls (31.4 mA vs 20.2 mA, P < 0.05), and rectal mucosal blood flow than patients with evacuation difficulty and controls (107 vs 162 flux units (FU) [evacuation difficulty] vs 169 FU [controls], P < 0.05). Only patients with passive FI were associated with reflex abnormalities (prolonged recovery phase (1.2 ms vs 0.5 ms, P < 0.05) and total duration of reflex (6.3 ms vs 4.3 ms, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal motor, sensory and reflex abnormalities are seen in distinct patterns in patients with FI and constipation. This would suggest distinct physiological differences that may predict the potential for different neuromodulation treatment and behavioral modalities in these conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fecal incontinence (FI) and constipation can arise from a variety of alterations of anorectal function. This study aimed to investigate the components of the anorecal reflex in patients with these symptoms and to determine the functional significance of various physiological parameters. METHODS: Altogether 21 healthy volunteers (controls) and 78 FI-predominant and 74 constipation-predominant patients were recruited and administered Wexner incontinence and constipation questionnaires. All participants underwent standardized anorectal physiology assessments. RESULTS: O, P < 0.05). Patients with urge FI had lower maximal tolerable volumes (100 mL vs 166 mL, P < 0.05). Patients with slow-transit constipation had elevated rectal electrosensitivity thresholds compared with controls (31.4 mA vs 20.2 mA, P < 0.05), and rectal mucosal blood flow than patients with evacuation difficulty and controls (107 vs 162 flux units (FU) [evacuation difficulty] vs 169 FU [controls], P < 0.05). Only patients with passive FI were associated with reflex abnormalities (prolonged recovery phase (1.2 ms vs 0.5 ms, P < 0.05) and total duration of reflex (6.3 ms vs 4.3 ms, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal motor, sensory and reflex abnormalities are seen in distinct patterns in patients with FI and constipation. This would suggest distinct physiological differences that may predict the potential for different neuromodulation treatment and behavioral modalities in these conditions.

Key concepts: Defecation, Medicine, Reflex, Rectal diseases, Anus Diseases, Anorectal manometry, Fecal incontinence, Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Physiological study of the anorectal reflex in patients with functional anorectal and defecation disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens