2008•Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and AnalgesiaOpen access

Antiemetic prophylaxis with promethazine or ondansetron in major gynaecological surgery : original research

O.J. Olatosi, O.T. Kushimo, Chukwuemelie D Okeke, O. Oriyomi, G O Ajayi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background : Postoperative nausea and vomiting remain a significant cause of morbidity among patients undergoing general anaesthesia. The optimal strategy for prevention, however, remains controversial. This study evaluated the efficacy of ondansetron 8 mg compared with promethazine 25 mg or placebo for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing elective major gynaecological surgery. Methods : Seventy-five patients received intravenous injection of the study medication (ondansetron-25, promethazine-25 or placebo-25) immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. Nausea and vomiting were assessed over a 24-hour postoperative period. Results : Nausea occurred in 20%, 40% and 72% of the promethazine, ondansetron and placebo groups respectively (p = 0.001). The overall incidence of vomiting was 12%, 16%, and 60% (p = 0.000) for promethazine, ondansetron and the placebo respectively. Postoperative drowsiness was prominent in the promethazine group. There was no significant difference in effectiveness between promethazine and ondansetron. Conclusions : Promethazine 25 mg was significantly more effective than ondansetron 8 mg in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Promethazine is inexpensive and the cost of drugs is of importance in developing African countries. Drowsiness was a significant side-effect with promethazine, and this will be a disadvantage in ambulatory surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background : Postoperative nausea and vomiting remain a significant cause of morbidity among patients undergoing general anaesthesia. The optimal strategy for prevention, however, remains controversial. This study evaluated the efficacy of ondansetron 8 mg compared with promethazine 25 mg or placebo for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing elective major gynaecological surgery. Methods : Seventy-five patients received intravenous injection of the study medication (ondansetron-25, promethazine-25 or placebo-25) immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. Nausea and vomiting were assessed over a 24-hour postoperative period. Results : Nausea occurred in 20%, 40% and 72% of the promethazine, ondansetron and placebo groups respectively (p = 0.001). The overall incidence of vomiting was 12%, 16%, and 60% (p = 0.000) for promethazine, ondansetron and the placebo respectively. Postoperative drowsiness was prominent in the promethazine group. There was no significant difference in effectiveness between promethazine and ondansetron. Conclusions : Promethazine 25 mg was significantly more effective than ondansetron 8 mg in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Promethazine is inexpensive and the cost of drugs is of importance in developing African countries. Drowsiness was a significant side-effect with promethazine, and this will be a disadvantage in ambulatory surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background : Postoperative nausea and vomiting remain a significant cause of morbidity among patients undergoing general anaesthesia. The optimal strategy for prevention, however, remains controversial. This study evaluated the efficacy of ondansetron 8 mg compared with promethazine 25 mg or placebo for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing elective major gynaecological surgery. Methods : Seventy-five patients received intravenous injection of the study medication (ondansetron-25, promethazine-25 or placebo-25) immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. Nausea and vomiting were assessed over a 24-hour postoperative period. Results : Nausea occurred in 20%, 40% and 72% of the promethazine, ondansetron and placebo groups respectively (p = 0.001). The overall incidence of vomiting was 12%, 16%, and 60% (p = 0.000) for promethazine, ondansetron and the placebo respectively. Postoperative drowsiness was prominent in the promethazine group. There was no significant difference in effectiveness between promethazine and ondansetron. Conclusions : Promethazine 25 mg was significantly more effective than ondansetron 8 mg in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Promethazine is inexpensive and the cost of drugs is of importance in developing African countries. Drowsiness was a significant side-effect with promethazine, and this will be a disadvantage in ambulatory surgery.

Key concepts: Promethazine, Ondansetron, Medicine, Nausea, Anesthesia, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Vomiting, Antiemetic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antiemetic prophylaxis with promethazine or ondansetron in major gynaecological surgery : original research — Research Paper | ScholarLens