The Impact of the Degree of Aquifer Confinement and Anisotropy on Tidal Pulse Propagation
Pin Shuai, Peter S.K. Knappett, Saddam Hossain, Alamgir Hosain, Kimberly Rhodes, Kazi Matin Ahmed, M. Bayani Cardenas
Abstract
Pin Shuai, Peter S.K. Knappett, Saddam Hossain, Alamgir Hosain, Kimberly Rhodes, Kazi Matin Ahmed, M. Bayani Cardenas
Abstract
Abstract Oceanic tidal fluctuations which propagate long distances up coastal rivers can be exploited to constrain hydraulic properties of riverbank aquifers. These estimates, however, may be sensitive to degree of aquifer confinement and aquifer anisotropy. We analyzed the hydraulic properties of a tidally influenced aquifer along the Meghna River in Bangladesh using: (1) slug tests combined with drilling logs and surface resistivity to estimate Transmissivity (T); (2) a pumping test to estimate T and Storativity (S) and thus Aquifer Diffusivity ( D PT ); and (3) the observed reduction in the amplitude and velocity of a tidal pulse to calculate D using the Jacob‐Ferris analytical solution. Average Hydraulic Conductivity (K) and T estimated with slug tests and borehole lithology were 27.3 m/d and 564 m 2 /d, respectively. Values of T and S determined from the pumping test ranged from 400 to 500 m 2 /d and 1 to 5 × 10 −4 , respectively with D PT ranging from 9 to 40 × 10 5 m 2 /d. In contrast, D estimated from the Jacob‐Ferris model ranged from 0.5 to 9 × 10 4 m 2 /d. We hypothesized this error resulted from deviations of the real aquifer conditions from those assumed by the Jacob‐Ferris model. Using a 2D numerical model tidal pulses were simulated across a range of conditions and D was calculated with the Jacob‐Ferris model. Moderately confined (K top /K aquifer < 0.01) or anisotropic aquifers (K x /K z > 10) yield D within a factor of 2 of the actual value. The order of magnitude difference in D between pumping test and Jacob‐Ferris model at our site argues for little confinement or anisotropy.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Oceanic tidal fluctuations which propagate long distances up coastal rivers can be exploited to constrain hydraulic properties of riverbank aquifers. These estimates, however, may be sensitive to degree of aquifer confinement and aquifer anisotropy. We analyzed the hydraulic properties of a tidally influenced aquifer along the Meghna River in Bangladesh using: (1) slug tests combined with drilling logs and surface resistivity to estimate Transmissivity (T); (2) a pumping test to estimate T and Storativity (S) and thus Aquifer Diffusivity ( D PT ); and (3) the observed reduction in the amplitude and velocity of a tidal pulse to calculate D using the Jacob‐Ferris analytical solution. Average Hydraulic Conductivity (K) and T estimated with slug tests and borehole lithology were 27.3 m/d and 564 m 2 /d, respectively. Values of T and S determined from the pumping test ranged from 400 to 500 m 2 /d and 1 to 5 × 10 −4 , respectively with D PT ranging from 9 to 40 × 10 5 m 2 /d. In contrast, D estimated from the Jacob‐Ferris model ranged from 0.5 to 9 × 10 4 m 2 /d. We hypothesized this error resulted from deviations of the real aquifer conditions from those assumed by the Jacob‐Ferris model. Using a 2D numerical model tidal pulses were simulated across a range of conditions and D was calculated with the Jacob‐Ferris model. Moderately confined (K top /K aquifer < 0.01) or anisotropic aquifers (K x /K z > 10) yield D within a factor of 2 of the actual value. The order of magnitude difference in D between pumping test and Jacob‐Ferris model at our site argues for little confinement or anisotropy.
Key concepts: Aquifer, Slug test, Geology, Borehole, Hydraulic conductivity, Anisotropy, Aquifer test, Amplitude