2017World Journal of SurgeryOpen access

Major Complex Abdominal Wall Repair in Contaminated Fields with Use of a Non‐cross‐linked Biologic Mesh: A Dual‐Institutional Experience

Jasper J. Atema, Edgar J.B. Furnée, Yasuko Maeda, Janindra H. Warusavitarne, Pieter Job Tanis, Willem Adrianus Bemelman, Carolynne J. Vaizey, Marja A. Boermeester

Open full text 47 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Data on the use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall repair in complex cases remain sparse. Aim of this study was to evaluate a non‐cross‐linked porcine acellular dermal matrix for repair of complex contaminated abdominal wall defects. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing abdominal wall repair with use of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix (LifeCell Corporation, Oxford, UK) between January 2011 and February 2015 at two National Intestinal Failure Units. Results Eighty patients were identified. Indications for abdominal wall repair included enterocutaneous fistula takedown (n = 50), infected synthetic mesh removal (n = 9), restoration of continuity or creation of a stoma with concomitant ventral hernia repair (n = 12), and others (n = 9). The median defect area was 143.0 cm2 (interquartile range or IQR 70.0–256.0 cm2). All had a grade III or IV hernia. Component separation technique (CST) was performed in 54 patients (68%). Complete fascial closure was not possible despite CST and biologic mesh‐assisted traction (bridged repair) in 20 patients (25%). In‐hospital mortality was 1%. Thirty‐six patients (45%) developed a wound infection. None required mesh removal. Of 76 patients with a median clinical follow‐up of 7 months (IQR 4–15) available for analysis, 10 patients (13%) developed a hernia recurrence, of whom 3 had undergone bridged repairs. Seven patients developed a postoperative (recurrent) fistula (9%). Conclusion Repair of challenging and contaminated abdominal wall defects can be done effectively with non‐cross‐linked biologic mesh and component separation technique without the need for mesh removal despite wound infections.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background Data on the use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall repair in complex cases remain sparse. Aim of this study was to evaluate a non‐cross‐linked porcine acellular dermal matrix for repair of complex contaminated abdominal wall defects. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing abdominal wall repair with use of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix (LifeCell Corporation, Oxford, UK) between January 2011 and February 2015 at two National Intestinal Failure Units. Results Eighty patients were identified. Indications for abdominal wall repair included enterocutaneous fistula takedown (n = 50), infected synthetic mesh removal (n = 9), restoration of continuity or creation of a stoma with concomitant ventral hernia repair (n = 12), and others (n = 9). The median defect area was 143.0 cm2 (interquartile range or IQR 70.0–256.0 cm2). All had a grade III or IV hernia. Component separation technique (CST) was performed in 54 patients (68%). Complete fascial closure was not possible despite CST and biologic mesh‐assisted traction (bridged repair) in 20 patients (25%). In‐hospital mortality was 1%. Thirty‐six patients (45%) developed a wound infection. None required mesh removal. Of 76 patients with a median clinical follow‐up of 7 months (IQR 4–15) available for analysis, 10 patients (13%) developed a hernia recurrence, of whom 3 had undergone bridged repairs. Seven patients developed a postoperative (recurrent) fistula (9%). Conclusion Repair of challenging and contaminated abdominal wall defects can be done effectively with non‐cross‐linked biologic mesh and component separation technique without the need for mesh removal despite wound infections.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background Data on the use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall repair in complex cases remain sparse. Aim of this study was to evaluate a non‐cross‐linked porcine acellular dermal matrix for repair of complex contaminated abdominal wall defects. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing abdominal wall repair with use of Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix (LifeCell Corporation, Oxford, UK) between January 2011 and February 2015 at two National Intestinal Failure Units. Results Eighty patients were identified. Indications for abdominal wall repair included enterocutaneous fistula takedown (n = 50), infected synthetic mesh removal (n = 9), restoration of continuity or creation of a stoma with concomitant ventral hernia repair (n = 12), and others (n = 9). The median defect area was 143.0 cm2 (interquartile range or IQR 70.0–256.0 cm2). All had a grade III or IV hernia. Component separation technique (CST) was performed in 54 patients (68%). Complete fascial closure was not possible despite CST and biologic mesh‐assisted traction (bridged repair) in 20 patients (25%). In‐hospital mortality was 1%. Thirty‐six patients (45%) developed a wound infection. None required mesh removal. Of 76 patients with a median clinical follow‐up of 7 months (IQR 4–15) available for analysis, 10 patients (13%) developed a hernia recurrence, of whom 3 had undergone bridged repairs. Seven patients developed a postoperative (recurrent) fistula (9%). Conclusion Repair of challenging and contaminated abdominal wall defects can be done effectively with non‐cross‐linked biologic mesh and component separation technique without the need for mesh removal despite wound infections.

Key concepts: Medicine, Enterocutaneous fistula, Abdominal wall, Surgery, Abdominal surgery, Interquartile range, Hernia repair, Surgical mesh

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Major Complex Abdominal Wall Repair in Contaminated Fields with Use of a Non‐cross‐linked Biologic Mesh: A Dual‐Institutional Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens