1965Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

A Study of the Effects of Wet Surface Soil Conditions on the Performance of a Single Pneumatic-Tired Wheel

Jerry L. Smith

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

A test program was conducted to determine the effects of wet surface soil conditions on the performance of pneumatic tires. The surface soil conditions were of three types: (a) unflodded (as compacted), (b) flooded and undrained, and (c) flooded and drained. Most of the tests were conducted with one soil (fat clay) and one tire deflection (35 percent). All test tires were 6.00-16, 4-PR. Four tire surfaces, called tread patterns in this report, were tested: a smooth tire (i.e. no tread), a directional tread, a nondirectional tread, and a smooth tire with a traction aid. Test results showed that in soils exhibiting nonuniform soil-strength profiles, the type and extent of the nonuniformity largely controlled the tire performance. For a given wheel load, the loss of pull due to flooding, expressed as a percentage of the pull in the unflooded condition, was essentially constant for each tread pattern. The treated tires and the smooth tire with traction aid performed better than the smooth tire in flooded soil. In the unflooded soil, the tread pattern made a considerable difference in performance. Peak performance usually was attained at an optimum load, regardless of tread pattern or soil condition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A test program was conducted to determine the effects of wet surface soil conditions on the performance of pneumatic tires. The surface soil conditions were of three types: (a) unflodded (as compacted), (b) flooded and undrained, and (c) flooded and drained. Most of the tests were conducted with one soil (fat clay) and one tire deflection (35 percent). All test tires were 6.00-16, 4-PR. Four tire surfaces, called tread patterns in this report, were tested: a smooth tire (i.e. no tread), a directional tread, a nondirectional tread, and a smooth tire with a traction aid. Test results showed that in soils exhibiting nonuniform soil-strength profiles, the type and extent of the nonuniformity largely controlled the tire performance. For a given wheel load, the loss of pull due to flooding, expressed as a percentage of the pull in the unflooded condition, was essentially constant for each tread pattern. The treated tires and the smooth tire with traction aid performed better than the smooth tire in flooded soil. In the unflooded soil, the tread pattern made a considerable difference in performance. Peak performance usually was attained at an optimum load, regardless of tread pattern or soil condition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A test program was conducted to determine the effects of wet surface soil conditions on the performance of pneumatic tires. The surface soil conditions were of three types: (a) unflodded (as compacted), (b) flooded and undrained, and (c) flooded and drained. Most of the tests were conducted with one soil (fat clay) and one tire deflection (35 percent). All test tires were 6.00-16, 4-PR. Four tire surfaces, called tread patterns in this report, were tested: a smooth tire (i.e. no tread), a directional tread, a nondirectional tread, and a smooth tire with a traction aid. Test results showed that in soils exhibiting nonuniform soil-strength profiles, the type and extent of the nonuniformity largely controlled the tire performance. For a given wheel load, the loss of pull due to flooding, expressed as a percentage of the pull in the unflooded condition, was essentially constant for each tread pattern. The treated tires and the smooth tire with traction aid performed better than the smooth tire in flooded soil. In the unflooded soil, the tread pattern made a considerable difference in performance. Peak performance usually was attained at an optimum load, regardless of tread pattern or soil condition.

Key concepts: Environmental science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study of the Effects of Wet Surface Soil Conditions on the Performance of a Single Pneumatic-Tired Wheel — Research Paper | ScholarLens