2017•Public IntegrityRequires access

The Search for Accountability: United States v. McDonnell and the Fundamental Right to Honest Government

Robert North Roberts

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court in McDonnell v. United States (2016 U.S. Supreme Court. (2016). Oral arguments. Robert F. McDonnell v. United States, April 27. Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/15-474_1bn2.pdf [Google Scholar]) vacated the conviction of a former Virginia governor for accepting bribes. The court found that arranging a meeting, calling or contacting another official, or hosting an event does not, by itself, rise to the level of an official act under the Hobbs Act and the mail and wire fraud statutes. This article argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell v. United States will make it much more difficult for federal prosecutors to prosecute state and local governments for helping private individuals gain preferential access to government decision-makers at the state or local level. The article also argues that the decision will put pressure on state legislatures to significantly tighten state ethics laws to stop this type of conduct that reduces public trust in government.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.S. Supreme Court in McDonnell v. United States (2016 U.S. Supreme Court. (2016). Oral arguments. Robert F. McDonnell v. United States, April 27. Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/15-474_1bn2.pdf [Google Scholar]) vacated the conviction of a former Virginia governor for accepting bribes. The court found that arranging a meeting, calling or contacting another official, or hosting an event does not, by itself, rise to the level of an official act under the Hobbs Act and the mail and wire fraud statutes. This article argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell v. United States will make it much more difficult for federal prosecutors to prosecute state and local governments for helping private individuals gain preferential access to government decision-makers at the state or local level. The article also argues that the decision will put pressure on state legislatures to significantly tighten state ethics laws to stop this type of conduct that reduces public trust in government.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court in McDonnell v. United States (2016 U.S. Supreme Court. (2016). Oral arguments. Robert F. McDonnell v. United States, April 27. Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/15-474_1bn2.pdf [Google Scholar]) vacated the conviction of a former Virginia governor for accepting bribes. The court found that arranging a meeting, calling or contacting another official, or hosting an event does not, by itself, rise to the level of an official act under the Hobbs Act and the mail and wire fraud statutes. This article argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell v. United States will make it much more difficult for federal prosecutors to prosecute state and local governments for helping private individuals gain preferential access to government decision-makers at the state or local level. The article also argues that the decision will put pressure on state legislatures to significantly tighten state ethics laws to stop this type of conduct that reduces public trust in government.

Key concepts: Accountability, Government (linguistics), Political science, Public administration, Law and economics, Law, Public relations, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Search for Accountability: United States v. McDonnell and the Fundamental Right to Honest Government — Research Paper | ScholarLens