2017Acta Oto-Laryngologica Case ReportsOpen access

Bilateral stapes agenesis: What can we find?

Mathieu Bergeron, Mathieu Côté

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

We describe the youngest case of bilateral stapes agenesis and systematically reviewed the literature. Among those cases, 8/12 (66.7%) showed a bilateral agenesis. There is a male predominance 8/12 (66.7%). The most common associated anomaly reported being either a dehiscent or displaced facial nerve (7/12–58%). Furthermore, 5/12 patients (42%) had a narrow or an absent oval window. In our case, a 5-year-old male patient was referred for bilateral conductive hearing loss (air-bone gap 65 dB, bilateral). Operating findings on the left side included an inferiorly displaced facial nerve over the promontory, a narrow ossified oval window and an absent stapes. A stapedotomy with insertion of a modified stapes prosthesis allowed us to close the conductive gap. Even with possible good outcomes, surgical management should not be taken lightly, considering amplification is almost always a safe and effective option.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We describe the youngest case of bilateral stapes agenesis and systematically reviewed the literature. Among those cases, 8/12 (66.7%) showed a bilateral agenesis. There is a male predominance 8/12 (66.7%). The most common associated anomaly reported being either a dehiscent or displaced facial nerve (7/12–58%). Furthermore, 5/12 patients (42%) had a narrow or an absent oval window. In our case, a 5-year-old male patient was referred for bilateral conductive hearing loss (air-bone gap 65 dB, bilateral). Operating findings on the left side included an inferiorly displaced facial nerve over the promontory, a narrow ossified oval window and an absent stapes. A stapedotomy with insertion of a modified stapes prosthesis allowed us to close the conductive gap. Even with possible good outcomes, surgical management should not be taken lightly, considering amplification is almost always a safe and effective option.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We describe the youngest case of bilateral stapes agenesis and systematically reviewed the literature. Among those cases, 8/12 (66.7%) showed a bilateral agenesis. There is a male predominance 8/12 (66.7%). The most common associated anomaly reported being either a dehiscent or displaced facial nerve (7/12–58%). Furthermore, 5/12 patients (42%) had a narrow or an absent oval window. In our case, a 5-year-old male patient was referred for bilateral conductive hearing loss (air-bone gap 65 dB, bilateral). Operating findings on the left side included an inferiorly displaced facial nerve over the promontory, a narrow ossified oval window and an absent stapes. A stapedotomy with insertion of a modified stapes prosthesis allowed us to close the conductive gap. Even with possible good outcomes, surgical management should not be taken lightly, considering amplification is almost always a safe and effective option.

Key concepts: Stapes, Oval window, Medicine, Conductive hearing loss, Incus, Facial nerve, Agenesis, Stapedectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bilateral stapes agenesis: What can we find? — Research Paper | ScholarLens