2016Journal of muscle and joint healthOpen access

The Perception and Utilization patterns of Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Kyoung Ran Kong, Eun Nam Lee, Won Tae Jeong

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception and utilization patterns of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods: A total of 92 fibromyalgia syndrome patients participated in this study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: As a result, 59.8% of subjects had an experience of CAM and 33.7% of subjects have used until now. There were significant differences of the use of CAM between the group of CAM users and non-CAM users by education ( $x^2$ =4.04, p=.044), period of illness ( $x^2$ =15.03, p=.001), and period of treatment ( $x^2$ =12.10, p=.002). Relatively large numbers of patients understanded as that CAM was effective (58.7%) and fibromyalgia syndrome was controllable (75.0%). Moreover, there were significant differences of the use of CAM by the perception of CAM effects ( $x^2$ =4.15, p=.042), fibromyalgia syndrome ( $x^2$ =6.55, p=.038), and best treatment for fibromyalgia ( $x^2$ =11.03, p=.001). Conclusion: These results could be utilized as a basic data for developing nursing intervention for fibromyalgia syndrome.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception and utilization patterns of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods: A total of 92 fibromyalgia syndrome patients participated in this study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: As a result, 59.8% of subjects had an experience of CAM and 33.7% of subjects have used until now. There were significant differences of the use of CAM between the group of CAM users and non-CAM users by education ( $x^2$ =4.04, p=.044), period of illness ( $x^2$ =15.03, p=.001), and period of treatment ( $x^2$ =12.10, p=.002). Relatively large numbers of patients understanded as that CAM was effective (58.7%) and fibromyalgia syndrome was controllable (75.0%). Moreover, there were significant differences of the use of CAM by the perception of CAM effects ( $x^2$ =4.15, p=.042), fibromyalgia syndrome ( $x^2$ =6.55, p=.038), and best treatment for fibromyalgia ( $x^2$ =11.03, p=.001). Conclusion: These results could be utilized as a basic data for developing nursing intervention for fibromyalgia syndrome.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception and utilization patterns of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods: A total of 92 fibromyalgia syndrome patients participated in this study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: As a result, 59.8% of subjects had an experience of CAM and 33.7% of subjects have used until now. There were significant differences of the use of CAM between the group of CAM users and non-CAM users by education ( $x^2$ =4.04, p=.044), period of illness ( $x^2$ =15.03, p=.001), and period of treatment ( $x^2$ =12.10, p=.002). Relatively large numbers of patients understanded as that CAM was effective (58.7%) and fibromyalgia syndrome was controllable (75.0%). Moreover, there were significant differences of the use of CAM by the perception of CAM effects ( $x^2$ =4.15, p=.042), fibromyalgia syndrome ( $x^2$ =6.55, p=.038), and best treatment for fibromyalgia ( $x^2$ =11.03, p=.001). Conclusion: These results could be utilized as a basic data for developing nursing intervention for fibromyalgia syndrome.

Key concepts: Fibromyalgia, Fibromyalgia syndrome, Medicine, Physical therapy, Perception, Internal medicine, Psychology, Neuroscience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Perception and Utilization patterns of Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens