The Perception and Utilization patterns of Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Kyoung Ran Kong, Eun Nam Lee, Won Tae Jeong
Abstract
Open-access reader
Kyoung Ran Kong, Eun Nam Lee, Won Tae Jeong
Abstract
Open-access reader
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception and utilization patterns of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods: A total of 92 fibromyalgia syndrome patients participated in this study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: As a result, 59.8% of subjects had an experience of CAM and 33.7% of subjects have used until now. There were significant differences of the use of CAM between the group of CAM users and non-CAM users by education ( $x^2$ =4.04, p=.044), period of illness ( $x^2$ =15.03, p=.001), and period of treatment ( $x^2$ =12.10, p=.002). Relatively large numbers of patients understanded as that CAM was effective (58.7%) and fibromyalgia syndrome was controllable (75.0%). Moreover, there were significant differences of the use of CAM by the perception of CAM effects ( $x^2$ =4.15, p=.042), fibromyalgia syndrome ( $x^2$ =6.55, p=.038), and best treatment for fibromyalgia ( $x^2$ =11.03, p=.001). Conclusion: These results could be utilized as a basic data for developing nursing intervention for fibromyalgia syndrome.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception and utilization patterns of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods: A total of 92 fibromyalgia syndrome patients participated in this study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and were analyzed with SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: As a result, 59.8% of subjects had an experience of CAM and 33.7% of subjects have used until now. There were significant differences of the use of CAM between the group of CAM users and non-CAM users by education ( $x^2$ =4.04, p=.044), period of illness ( $x^2$ =15.03, p=.001), and period of treatment ( $x^2$ =12.10, p=.002). Relatively large numbers of patients understanded as that CAM was effective (58.7%) and fibromyalgia syndrome was controllable (75.0%). Moreover, there were significant differences of the use of CAM by the perception of CAM effects ( $x^2$ =4.15, p=.042), fibromyalgia syndrome ( $x^2$ =6.55, p=.038), and best treatment for fibromyalgia ( $x^2$ =11.03, p=.001). Conclusion: These results could be utilized as a basic data for developing nursing intervention for fibromyalgia syndrome.
Key concepts: Fibromyalgia, Fibromyalgia syndrome, Medicine, Physical therapy, Perception, Internal medicine, Psychology, Neuroscience