1974•Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)Open access

Feeding of Hatchery-reared Brown Trout (Salmo trutta L.) In Relation To The Diet In A South Dakota Stream

Richard W. McCoy

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

One thousand five hundred catchable brown trout (17-26 cm) were stocked into the South Fork of the Yellowbank River May 17, 1973. Samples were taken one month apart from May 22, 1973, through October 29, 1973. Fifteen-minute drift samples were collected every hour for 24 hours and trout were captured every 4 hours. Trout captured ruing the study varied in condition ® from 1.34 to 2.55. Condition progressively decreased through August, rose in September, and decreased again by the October sample. The average weight of brown trout increased through the September sample and decreased in October. Two peaks in number of drifting invertebrates occurred at night in the samples for May through September and one peak occurred at night in the October sample. All nighttime peaks were a result of changes in the number of drifting benthic and emergent invertebrates; the presence of terrestrial invertebrates influenced the daytime drift patterns. Adult chironomids accounted for 60-90 percent of the emergent drift, and chironomid pupae and larvae constituted a large portion of the benthic drift in the June, July, and August samples. Ephemeroptera were the second most abundant order of invertebrates in the drift; Baetidae and Caenidae contributed 95 percent of all mayflies collected. Hydropsychidae and Hydroptilidae comprised 93 percent of all drifting Trichoptera. Frogs and fishes were the primary food consumed by the brown trout examined. Trout ate a variety of invertebrates. Ephemeropterans comprised 45 percent by numbers, 27 percent by weight, and 21 percent by volume of all invertebrates consumed. Trichopterans constituted 20 percent by numbers, 34 percent by weight, and 38 percent by volume of all invertebrates consumed. Dipterans comprised 17 percent by numbers, 28 percent by weight, and 28 percent by volume of al invertebrates consumed. Correlation between mean drift rates (for the 4 hours prior to the trout sample) and mean stomach contents for all six sampling dates were not significant. Brown trout examined did not exploit the diel drift patterns of stream invertebrates. Hatchery-reared brown trout may require a longer acclimation time before full exploitation of invertebrate drift develops.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One thousand five hundred catchable brown trout (17-26 cm) were stocked into the South Fork of the Yellowbank River May 17, 1973. Samples were taken one month apart from May 22, 1973, through October 29, 1973. Fifteen-minute drift samples were collected every hour for 24 hours and trout were captured every 4 hours. Trout captured ruing the study varied in condition ® from 1.34 to 2.55. Condition progressively decreased through August, rose in September, and decreased again by the October sample. The average weight of brown trout increased through the September sample and decreased in October. Two peaks in number of drifting invertebrates occurred at night in the samples for May through September and one peak occurred at night in the October sample. All nighttime peaks were a result of changes in the number of drifting benthic and emergent invertebrates; the presence of terrestrial invertebrates influenced the daytime drift patterns. Adult chironomids accounted for 60-90 percent of the emergent drift, and chironomid pupae and larvae constituted a large portion of the benthic drift in the June, July, and August samples. Ephemeroptera were the second most abundant order of invertebrates in the drift; Baetidae and Caenidae contributed 95 percent of all mayflies collected. Hydropsychidae and Hydroptilidae comprised 93 percent of all drifting Trichoptera. Frogs and fishes were the primary food consumed by the brown trout examined. Trout ate a variety of invertebrates. Ephemeropterans comprised 45 percent by numbers, 27 percent by weight, and 21 percent by volume of all invertebrates consumed. Trichopterans constituted 20 percent by numbers, 34 percent by weight, and 38 percent by volume of all invertebrates consumed. Dipterans comprised 17 percent by numbers, 28 percent by weight, and 28 percent by volume of al invertebrates consumed. Correlation between mean drift rates (for the 4 hours prior to the trout sample) and mean stomach contents for all six sampling dates were not significant. Brown trout examined did not exploit the diel drift patterns of stream invertebrates. Hatchery-reared brown trout may require a longer acclimation time before full exploitation of invertebrate drift develops.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One thousand five hundred catchable brown trout (17-26 cm) were stocked into the South Fork of the Yellowbank River May 17, 1973. Samples were taken one month apart from May 22, 1973, through October 29, 1973. Fifteen-minute drift samples were collected every hour for 24 hours and trout were captured every 4 hours. Trout captured ruing the study varied in condition ® from 1.34 to 2.55. Condition progressively decreased through August, rose in September, and decreased again by the October sample. The average weight of brown trout increased through the September sample and decreased in October. Two peaks in number of drifting invertebrates occurred at night in the samples for May through September and one peak occurred at night in the October sample. All nighttime peaks were a result of changes in the number of drifting benthic and emergent invertebrates; the presence of terrestrial invertebrates influenced the daytime drift patterns. Adult chironomids accounted for 60-90 percent of the emergent drift, and chironomid pupae and larvae constituted a large portion of the benthic drift in the June, July, and August samples. Ephemeroptera were the second most abundant order of invertebrates in the drift; Baetidae and Caenidae contributed 95 percent of all mayflies collected. Hydropsychidae and Hydroptilidae comprised 93 percent of all drifting Trichoptera. Frogs and fishes were the primary food consumed by the brown trout examined. Trout ate a variety of invertebrates. Ephemeropterans comprised 45 percent by numbers, 27 percent by weight, and 21 percent by volume of all invertebrates consumed. Trichopterans constituted 20 percent by numbers, 34 percent by weight, and 38 percent by volume of all invertebrates consumed. Dipterans comprised 17 percent by numbers, 28 percent by weight, and 28 percent by volume of al invertebrates consumed. Correlation between mean drift rates (for the 4 hours prior to the trout sample) and mean stomach contents for all six sampling dates were not significant. Brown trout examined did not exploit the diel drift patterns of stream invertebrates. Hatchery-reared brown trout may require a longer acclimation time before full exploitation of invertebrate drift develops.

Key concepts: Salmo, Brown trout, Hatchery, Trout, Fishery, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Biology, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feeding of Hatchery-reared Brown Trout (Salmo trutta L.) In Relation To The Diet In A South Dakota Stream — Research Paper | ScholarLens