2017Procedia EngineeringOpen access

Evaluation of Proposed Backcalculation Procedure in Indonesia Overlay Design Guide

Bagus Hario Setiadji, Supriyono Supriyono

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Indonesia Directorate General of Highways’ overlay design guide Pd T-1-2002-B was developed by adopting the design procedure from 1993 AASHTO Design Guide. One evaluation in the guide was an evaluation of subgrade condition, in terms of elastic moduli, using backcalculation procedure from field deflection data. One main drawback of the backcalculation procedure in the guide is the use of adjustment factor (C) to make the calculated moduli conform to the measured ones. In addition, the guide also did not provide the evaluation of remained capacity of surface layer that could be the important key for deciding the overall condition of the existing pavement. In this paper, a backcalculation procedure in the guide for determining remaining capacity of surface layer was proposed. For the sake of comparison, another backcalculation procedure based on best-fit trial-and-error approach was employed, and the results of both algorithm procedures were validated using measured pavement properties pavement properties from Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database. The results of the study indicated that proposed procedure failed to produce the expected results. Besides, the high deviation between calculated moduli (from both backcalculation procedure) and measured ones leads to a recommendation of developing a better backcalculation procedure.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Indonesia Directorate General of Highways’ overlay design guide Pd T-1-2002-B was developed by adopting the design procedure from 1993 AASHTO Design Guide. One evaluation in the guide was an evaluation of subgrade condition, in terms of elastic moduli, using backcalculation procedure from field deflection data. One main drawback of the backcalculation procedure in the guide is the use of adjustment factor (C) to make the calculated moduli conform to the measured ones. In addition, the guide also did not provide the evaluation of remained capacity of surface layer that could be the important key for deciding the overall condition of the existing pavement. In this paper, a backcalculation procedure in the guide for determining remaining capacity of surface layer was proposed. For the sake of comparison, another backcalculation procedure based on best-fit trial-and-error approach was employed, and the results of both algorithm procedures were validated using measured pavement properties pavement properties from Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database. The results of the study indicated that proposed procedure failed to produce the expected results. Besides, the high deviation between calculated moduli (from both backcalculation procedure) and measured ones leads to a recommendation of developing a better backcalculation procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Indonesia Directorate General of Highways’ overlay design guide Pd T-1-2002-B was developed by adopting the design procedure from 1993 AASHTO Design Guide. One evaluation in the guide was an evaluation of subgrade condition, in terms of elastic moduli, using backcalculation procedure from field deflection data. One main drawback of the backcalculation procedure in the guide is the use of adjustment factor (C) to make the calculated moduli conform to the measured ones. In addition, the guide also did not provide the evaluation of remained capacity of surface layer that could be the important key for deciding the overall condition of the existing pavement. In this paper, a backcalculation procedure in the guide for determining remaining capacity of surface layer was proposed. For the sake of comparison, another backcalculation procedure based on best-fit trial-and-error approach was employed, and the results of both algorithm procedures were validated using measured pavement properties pavement properties from Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database. The results of the study indicated that proposed procedure failed to produce the expected results. Besides, the high deviation between calculated moduli (from both backcalculation procedure) and measured ones leads to a recommendation of developing a better backcalculation procedure.

Key concepts: Overlay, Deflection (physics), Subgrade, Falling weight deflectometer, Structural engineering, Moduli, Engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Proposed Backcalculation Procedure in Indonesia Overlay Design Guide — Research Paper | ScholarLens