ScholarLens Back to search
2007•CEA ForumRequires access

Covering (Up?) Katrina: Discursive Ambivalence in Coverage of Hurricane Katrina.

Aimee Berger, Kate Cochran

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Hurricane katrina, Ambivalence, Natural disaster, Political science, Sociology, Geography, Meteorology, Psychology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Covering (Up?) Katrina: Discursive Ambivalence in Coverage of Hurricane Katrina. — Research Paper | ScholarLens