2010Studies in African LinguisticsOpen access

On the Verbal Origin of the Verbal Suffixes of Bantu Verb Suffixes

Talmy Givón

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

What follows below is a hypothesis. It is by no means fully proven. I will attempt to bring a certain amount of data to show that it has definite empirical contents, then argue from several more universal considerations. The more general view which underlies the hypothesis presented here may be found in Givon [1971a]. Briefly, it is there suggested that in order to understand the current morphology and morphotactics of a language, one must construct highly specific hypotheses concerning the syntax of that language at some earlier historical stage of its development. Conversely, it is also suggested there that synchronic morphologies and morphotactics are a most powerful tool for reconstructing earlier diachronic stages in the syntax of a language.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

What follows below is a hypothesis. It is by no means fully proven. I will attempt to bring a certain amount of data to show that it has definite empirical contents, then argue from several more universal considerations. The more general view which underlies the hypothesis presented here may be found in Givon [1971a]. Briefly, it is there suggested that in order to understand the current morphology and morphotactics of a language, one must construct highly specific hypotheses concerning the syntax of that language at some earlier historical stage of its development. Conversely, it is also suggested there that synchronic morphologies and morphotactics are a most powerful tool for reconstructing earlier diachronic stages in the syntax of a language.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

What follows below is a hypothesis. It is by no means fully proven. I will attempt to bring a certain amount of data to show that it has definite empirical contents, then argue from several more universal considerations. The more general view which underlies the hypothesis presented here may be found in Givon [1971a]. Briefly, it is there suggested that in order to understand the current morphology and morphotactics of a language, one must construct highly specific hypotheses concerning the syntax of that language at some earlier historical stage of its development. Conversely, it is also suggested there that synchronic morphologies and morphotactics are a most powerful tool for reconstructing earlier diachronic stages in the syntax of a language.

Key concepts: Linguistics, Bantu languages, Syntax, Verb, Construct (python library), Computer science, Root (linguistics), Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Verbal Origin of the Verbal Suffixes of Bantu Verb Suffixes — Research Paper | ScholarLens