2008Unpublished venueRequires access

An effect analysis of hemihepatic vascular occlusion and pringle maneuver in Liver cancer operation

HU Li-sheng, Xiongying Miao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the application and efficacy of hemihepatie vascular occlusion in HCC resection. Methods 90 ca-ses of HCC patients were roiled in and divided into two groups. Liver resection was performed with Pringle maneuver or hemihepatic vascular occhusion. Ischemia time, operative time, blood loss, postoperative liver function, the occurrence of complications and the recovery of gastro-intestinal function were recorded. The efficacy of the two occlusions was compared. Results There is no significant difference between hemibepatic vascular occlusion and Pringle maneuver in ischemia time, operative time, blood loss (P>0.05). However, there is signifi-cant difference in postoperative liver function, the occurrence of complications and intestinal function recovery time. The former is significant-ly superior to the latter (P<0.05). Conclusions The bemihepatic vascular occlusion and Pringle maneuver occlusion have no difference in ischemia time, operative time and blood loss. But bemihepatic vascular occlusion has less impact on liver function, lower rate of occur-rence of complications and faster recovery speed. Therefore, hemibepatie vascular occlusion is better than Pfingle maneuver occlusion in be-parle inflow occlusion in HCC surgery. Key words: Liver neoplasms/SU;  Hepatectomy/MT

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the application and efficacy of hemihepatie vascular occlusion in HCC resection. Methods 90 ca-ses of HCC patients were roiled in and divided into two groups. Liver resection was performed with Pringle maneuver or hemihepatic vascular occhusion. Ischemia time, operative time, blood loss, postoperative liver function, the occurrence of complications and the recovery of gastro-intestinal function were recorded. The efficacy of the two occlusions was compared. Results There is no significant difference between hemibepatic vascular occlusion and Pringle maneuver in ischemia time, operative time, blood loss (P>0.05). However, there is signifi-cant difference in postoperative liver function, the occurrence of complications and intestinal function recovery time. The former is significant-ly superior to the latter (P<0.05). Conclusions The bemihepatic vascular occlusion and Pringle maneuver occlusion have no difference in ischemia time, operative time and blood loss. But bemihepatic vascular occlusion has less impact on liver function, lower rate of occur-rence of complications and faster recovery speed. Therefore, hemibepatie vascular occlusion is better than Pfingle maneuver occlusion in be-parle inflow occlusion in HCC surgery. Key words: Liver neoplasms/SU;  Hepatectomy/MT

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the application and efficacy of hemihepatie vascular occlusion in HCC resection. Methods 90 ca-ses of HCC patients were roiled in and divided into two groups. Liver resection was performed with Pringle maneuver or hemihepatic vascular occhusion. Ischemia time, operative time, blood loss, postoperative liver function, the occurrence of complications and the recovery of gastro-intestinal function were recorded. The efficacy of the two occlusions was compared. Results There is no significant difference between hemibepatic vascular occlusion and Pringle maneuver in ischemia time, operative time, blood loss (P>0.05). However, there is signifi-cant difference in postoperative liver function, the occurrence of complications and intestinal function recovery time. The former is significant-ly superior to the latter (P<0.05). Conclusions The bemihepatic vascular occlusion and Pringle maneuver occlusion have no difference in ischemia time, operative time and blood loss. But bemihepatic vascular occlusion has less impact on liver function, lower rate of occur-rence of complications and faster recovery speed. Therefore, hemibepatie vascular occlusion is better than Pfingle maneuver occlusion in be-parle inflow occlusion in HCC surgery. Key words: Liver neoplasms/SU;  Hepatectomy/MT

Key concepts: Medicine, Vascular occlusion, Occlusion, Hepatectomy, Blood loss, Ischemia, Liver function, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An effect analysis of hemihepatic vascular occlusion and pringle maneuver in Liver cancer operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens