2016International Journal of Corporate GovernanceRequires access

Executive compensation, corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from India

Suhas M. Avabruth, Palanisamy Saravanan, Maram Srikanth

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Compensation received by the company directors attracted widespread attention in the recent literature. The existing research focused mainly on the executive compensation, and largely ignored non-executive compensation. Our study focused on the effect of corporate governance and performance variables on the executive as well as non-executive compensation structures in the Indian context. We obtained supporting evidence for managerial power theory as well as tournament theory in this paper. However, we could not find conclusive evidence for the agency theory with regard to executive compensation. Our research shows that as the board size enlarges, executive compensation rises further. However, we found that the proportion of non-executive directors (NEDs) on the board enhances executive compensation. We observed that if the chief executive officer plays dual role (CEO cum chairman) in a firm, NEDs receive lower remuneration. Our results reveal that the corporate governance variables namely board size, CEO duality and proportion of NEDs on the board have significant impact on the non-executive compensation. We affirm that our findings will be useful for the investors as well as institutions viz., the stock exchanges, academic institutions and the regulators as it integrates the relationship among the components of executive compensation, corporate governance and firm performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compensation received by the company directors attracted widespread attention in the recent literature. The existing research focused mainly on the executive compensation, and largely ignored non-executive compensation. Our study focused on the effect of corporate governance and performance variables on the executive as well as non-executive compensation structures in the Indian context. We obtained supporting evidence for managerial power theory as well as tournament theory in this paper. However, we could not find conclusive evidence for the agency theory with regard to executive compensation. Our research shows that as the board size enlarges, executive compensation rises further. However, we found that the proportion of non-executive directors (NEDs) on the board enhances executive compensation. We observed that if the chief executive officer plays dual role (CEO cum chairman) in a firm, NEDs receive lower remuneration. Our results reveal that the corporate governance variables namely board size, CEO duality and proportion of NEDs on the board have significant impact on the non-executive compensation. We affirm that our findings will be useful for the investors as well as institutions viz., the stock exchanges, academic institutions and the regulators as it integrates the relationship among the components of executive compensation, corporate governance and firm performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compensation received by the company directors attracted widespread attention in the recent literature. The existing research focused mainly on the executive compensation, and largely ignored non-executive compensation. Our study focused on the effect of corporate governance and performance variables on the executive as well as non-executive compensation structures in the Indian context. We obtained supporting evidence for managerial power theory as well as tournament theory in this paper. However, we could not find conclusive evidence for the agency theory with regard to executive compensation. Our research shows that as the board size enlarges, executive compensation rises further. However, we found that the proportion of non-executive directors (NEDs) on the board enhances executive compensation. We observed that if the chief executive officer plays dual role (CEO cum chairman) in a firm, NEDs receive lower remuneration. Our results reveal that the corporate governance variables namely board size, CEO duality and proportion of NEDs on the board have significant impact on the non-executive compensation. We affirm that our findings will be useful for the investors as well as institutions viz., the stock exchanges, academic institutions and the regulators as it integrates the relationship among the components of executive compensation, corporate governance and firm performance.

Key concepts: Corporate governance, Executive compensation, Business, Accounting, Compensation (psychology), Psychology, Finance, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Executive compensation, corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from India — Research Paper | ScholarLens