2016•Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University)Open access

Surface Electromyography analysis of the free, Smith Machine and split squats performed by strength-trained males.

Eric Chauhan, Craig Alan Bridge, Benjamin Hammond, Pascual Marqués‐Bruna

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Squats recruit a large proportion of the body’s muscular system and provide the foundation for strength training programs for athletes. However, our understanding of electromyographical activity in variations of the high-bar back-squat, notably the split squat, is somehow limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate surface electromyography (sEMG) activity in the free, Smith and split types of squat. A randomised sample of 10 healthy strength-trained males (age, 20.3 ± 0.5 years; height, 1.7 ± 0.6 m; mass, 78.1 ± 9.5 kg) performed 3 repetitions of each type of squat at 75% of their 1RM. A Noraxon EMG - Raxon system was used to collect peak EMG, RMS EMG, and iEMG for the eccentric and concentric phases of the squat. All sEMG data was normalised to the Smith squat. Two-way ANOVAs were used for type-of-squat and phase-of-squat (p ≤ 0.01). Statistically significant effects for type-of-squat were found for peak EMG and iEMG of the bicep femoris (BF), lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and tibialis anterior (TA) (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.003). Significant differences in phase-of-squat were found for peak EMG and RMS EMG of BF (p = 0.001). RMS EMG of the BF (p = 0.002) and LG (p = 0.001) showed significant differences regarding type-of-squat. Therefore, the split squat elicited higher BF and LG muscle activity compared to the free and Smith squats. The findings suggest that the split squat optimally stimulates the BF and LG and should consequently be incorporated into strength and conditioning programs for athletes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Squats recruit a large proportion of the body’s muscular system and provide the foundation for strength training programs for athletes. However, our understanding of electromyographical activity in variations of the high-bar back-squat, notably the split squat, is somehow limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate surface electromyography (sEMG) activity in the free, Smith and split types of squat. A randomised sample of 10 healthy strength-trained males (age, 20.3 ± 0.5 years; height, 1.7 ± 0.6 m; mass, 78.1 ± 9.5 kg) performed 3 repetitions of each type of squat at 75% of their 1RM. A Noraxon EMG - Raxon system was used to collect peak EMG, RMS EMG, and iEMG for the eccentric and concentric phases of the squat. All sEMG data was normalised to the Smith squat. Two-way ANOVAs were used for type-of-squat and phase-of-squat (p ≤ 0.01). Statistically significant effects for type-of-squat were found for peak EMG and iEMG of the bicep femoris (BF), lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and tibialis anterior (TA) (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.003). Significant differences in phase-of-squat were found for peak EMG and RMS EMG of BF (p = 0.001). RMS EMG of the BF (p = 0.002) and LG (p = 0.001) showed significant differences regarding type-of-squat. Therefore, the split squat elicited higher BF and LG muscle activity compared to the free and Smith squats. The findings suggest that the split squat optimally stimulates the BF and LG and should consequently be incorporated into strength and conditioning programs for athletes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Squats recruit a large proportion of the body’s muscular system and provide the foundation for strength training programs for athletes. However, our understanding of electromyographical activity in variations of the high-bar back-squat, notably the split squat, is somehow limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate surface electromyography (sEMG) activity in the free, Smith and split types of squat. A randomised sample of 10 healthy strength-trained males (age, 20.3 ± 0.5 years; height, 1.7 ± 0.6 m; mass, 78.1 ± 9.5 kg) performed 3 repetitions of each type of squat at 75% of their 1RM. A Noraxon EMG - Raxon system was used to collect peak EMG, RMS EMG, and iEMG for the eccentric and concentric phases of the squat. All sEMG data was normalised to the Smith squat. Two-way ANOVAs were used for type-of-squat and phase-of-squat (p ≤ 0.01). Statistically significant effects for type-of-squat were found for peak EMG and iEMG of the bicep femoris (BF), lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and tibialis anterior (TA) (0.001 ≤ p ≤ 0.003). Significant differences in phase-of-squat were found for peak EMG and RMS EMG of BF (p = 0.001). RMS EMG of the BF (p = 0.002) and LG (p = 0.001) showed significant differences regarding type-of-squat. Therefore, the split squat elicited higher BF and LG muscle activity compared to the free and Smith squats. The findings suggest that the split squat optimally stimulates the BF and LG and should consequently be incorporated into strength and conditioning programs for athletes.

Key concepts: Squat, Electromyography, Concentric, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Eccentric, Medicine, Physical therapy, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surface Electromyography analysis of the free, Smith Machine and split squats performed by strength-trained males. — Research Paper | ScholarLens