2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance Comparison on Biomass Gasification Reactor for Hydrogen Production

Muslim Muhammad Bilal, Suriyati Binti Saleh, Tuan Amran, Arshad Ahmad, Abdul Samad Noor Asma Fazli

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Nowadays biomass becomes one of the most important sources of renewable energy due to its abundant reserves and relatively low price compared with other energy sources. The main advantage of biomass as renewable energy source is its capability to produce near zero carbon dioxide emissions through the use of gasification process. Usually the gasification process either using downdraft fixed bed or bubbling fluidized bed is the most preferred gasifier in order to produce the hydrogen gas which is useful for energy production. In order to represent this gasification process, Aspen Plus simulator can be used as a process simulation study. However most of the simulation work done by the researchers are focusing on the coal gasification and only a limited work done on the biomass gasification. In addition, different gasifiers are used for different biomass which make its selection and use become confusing. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the gasifier performance between bubbling fluidized bed and downdraft fixed bed gasifiers using oil palm frond (OPF) as biomass input for hydrogen production. For this purpose, a comprehensive process model including hydrodynamics and reaction kinetics for both gasifiers are developed in the Aspen Plus software. The performance analysis for the biomass is evaluated in terms of the total of the syngas produced particularly hydrogen gas. Furthermore, the impact of operating variables such as air to biomass ratio and gasifier temperature on the syngas production are investigated through sensitivity analysis. Based on the performances and sensitivity analysis, gasification using fluidized bed produces 7.5% of hydrogen gas at operating temperature of 740°C and air to biomass ratio of 0.01 compared to only 5.4% of hydrogen gas at temperature of 760°C for fixed bed reactor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nowadays biomass becomes one of the most important sources of renewable energy due to its abundant reserves and relatively low price compared with other energy sources. The main advantage of biomass as renewable energy source is its capability to produce near zero carbon dioxide emissions through the use of gasification process. Usually the gasification process either using downdraft fixed bed or bubbling fluidized bed is the most preferred gasifier in order to produce the hydrogen gas which is useful for energy production. In order to represent this gasification process, Aspen Plus simulator can be used as a process simulation study. However most of the simulation work done by the researchers are focusing on the coal gasification and only a limited work done on the biomass gasification. In addition, different gasifiers are used for different biomass which make its selection and use become confusing. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the gasifier performance between bubbling fluidized bed and downdraft fixed bed gasifiers using oil palm frond (OPF) as biomass input for hydrogen production. For this purpose, a comprehensive process model including hydrodynamics and reaction kinetics for both gasifiers are developed in the Aspen Plus software. The performance analysis for the biomass is evaluated in terms of the total of the syngas produced particularly hydrogen gas. Furthermore, the impact of operating variables such as air to biomass ratio and gasifier temperature on the syngas production are investigated through sensitivity analysis. Based on the performances and sensitivity analysis, gasification using fluidized bed produces 7.5% of hydrogen gas at operating temperature of 740°C and air to biomass ratio of 0.01 compared to only 5.4% of hydrogen gas at temperature of 760°C for fixed bed reactor.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nowadays biomass becomes one of the most important sources of renewable energy due to its abundant reserves and relatively low price compared with other energy sources. The main advantage of biomass as renewable energy source is its capability to produce near zero carbon dioxide emissions through the use of gasification process. Usually the gasification process either using downdraft fixed bed or bubbling fluidized bed is the most preferred gasifier in order to produce the hydrogen gas which is useful for energy production. In order to represent this gasification process, Aspen Plus simulator can be used as a process simulation study. However most of the simulation work done by the researchers are focusing on the coal gasification and only a limited work done on the biomass gasification. In addition, different gasifiers are used for different biomass which make its selection and use become confusing. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the gasifier performance between bubbling fluidized bed and downdraft fixed bed gasifiers using oil palm frond (OPF) as biomass input for hydrogen production. For this purpose, a comprehensive process model including hydrodynamics and reaction kinetics for both gasifiers are developed in the Aspen Plus software. The performance analysis for the biomass is evaluated in terms of the total of the syngas produced particularly hydrogen gas. Furthermore, the impact of operating variables such as air to biomass ratio and gasifier temperature on the syngas production are investigated through sensitivity analysis. Based on the performances and sensitivity analysis, gasification using fluidized bed produces 7.5% of hydrogen gas at operating temperature of 740°C and air to biomass ratio of 0.01 compared to only 5.4% of hydrogen gas at temperature of 760°C for fixed bed reactor.

Key concepts: Wood gas generator, Syngas, Biomass (ecology), Environmental science, Renewable energy, Fluidized bed, Process engineering, Integrated gasification combined cycle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance Comparison on Biomass Gasification Reactor for Hydrogen Production — Research Paper | ScholarLens