Constitutional review of constitutional amendments
Biljana Kostadinov
Abstract
Biljana Kostadinov
Abstract
The article deals with unamendable constitutional provisions, their effectiveness and constitutional review of constitutional amendments developed in an effort to shield these lasting principles from revision. Offering insights into the jurisprudence of constitutional tribunals of Germany, Italy and India, the author concludes with an assessment of the viability of the substantive constitutional review of citizen-initiated referenda in the Republic of Croatia.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article deals with unamendable constitutional provisions, their effectiveness and constitutional review of constitutional amendments developed in an effort to shield these lasting principles from revision. Offering insights into the jurisprudence of constitutional tribunals of Germany, Italy and India, the author concludes with an assessment of the viability of the substantive constitutional review of citizen-initiated referenda in the Republic of Croatia.
Key concepts: Political science, Constitutional economics, Jurisprudence, Constitutional law, Law, Constitutional review, Constitutional court, Constitutional right