2015•International Journal of Blood Research and DisordersOpen access

The Evaluation of Serum Protein and Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Results in Patients with Monoclonal and Polyclonal Gammopathy: A Single Center Experience

Köksal Deveci

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To survey the diagnostic performance of serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) in clinical practice of gammopathies.Methods: One hundered and fifty five patients were evaluated by a retrospective review of our patient records to demostrate the SPE and SIFE results performed by the Clinical Biochemistry.The patients were divided into three groups as monoclonal gammopathy group (MGG), polyclonal gammopathy group (PGG) and biclonal gammopathy group (BGG).Results: Of the 155 patients, 48 (31%) were in MGG, 104 (67.1%) were in PGG and 3 (1.9%)were in BGG.In totally, there was an M spike in the gamma region in 113 patients, and of these patients, only 49 (43.4%) have been diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma.Of the 49 patients, 38 (79.1%) were in MGG, 8 (7.7%) were in PGG, and 3 (100%) were in BGG.When SPE plus SIFE were the testing panel, 11 (22.5%)patients were missed.The cutoff values were found as 7.25 for total protein (AUC = 0.728; p < 0.05) and 70.5 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (AUC = 0.692; p < 0.05). Conclusions:We demostrate that no single clinical laboratory test has sufficient sensitivity for the spectrum of plasma cell disorders.Because of missed 11 (22.5%)patients with myeloma in our study, a SPE be performed at the same time with SIFE results should be interpreted carefully.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To survey the diagnostic performance of serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) in clinical practice of gammopathies.Methods: One hundered and fifty five patients were evaluated by a retrospective review of our patient records to demostrate the SPE and SIFE results performed by the Clinical Biochemistry.The patients were divided into three groups as monoclonal gammopathy group (MGG), polyclonal gammopathy group (PGG) and biclonal gammopathy group (BGG).Results: Of the 155 patients, 48 (31%) were in MGG, 104 (67.1%) were in PGG and 3 (1.9%)were in BGG.In totally, there was an M spike in the gamma region in 113 patients, and of these patients, only 49 (43.4%) have been diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma.Of the 49 patients, 38 (79.1%) were in MGG, 8 (7.7%) were in PGG, and 3 (100%) were in BGG.When SPE plus SIFE were the testing panel, 11 (22.5%)patients were missed.The cutoff values were found as 7.25 for total protein (AUC = 0.728; p < 0.05) and 70.5 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (AUC = 0.692; p < 0.05). Conclusions:We demostrate that no single clinical laboratory test has sufficient sensitivity for the spectrum of plasma cell disorders.Because of missed 11 (22.5%)patients with myeloma in our study, a SPE be performed at the same time with SIFE results should be interpreted carefully.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To survey the diagnostic performance of serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) in clinical practice of gammopathies.Methods: One hundered and fifty five patients were evaluated by a retrospective review of our patient records to demostrate the SPE and SIFE results performed by the Clinical Biochemistry.The patients were divided into three groups as monoclonal gammopathy group (MGG), polyclonal gammopathy group (PGG) and biclonal gammopathy group (BGG).Results: Of the 155 patients, 48 (31%) were in MGG, 104 (67.1%) were in PGG and 3 (1.9%)were in BGG.In totally, there was an M spike in the gamma region in 113 patients, and of these patients, only 49 (43.4%) have been diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma.Of the 49 patients, 38 (79.1%) were in MGG, 8 (7.7%) were in PGG, and 3 (100%) were in BGG.When SPE plus SIFE were the testing panel, 11 (22.5%)patients were missed.The cutoff values were found as 7.25 for total protein (AUC = 0.728; p < 0.05) and 70.5 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (AUC = 0.692; p < 0.05). Conclusions:We demostrate that no single clinical laboratory test has sufficient sensitivity for the spectrum of plasma cell disorders.Because of missed 11 (22.5%)patients with myeloma in our study, a SPE be performed at the same time with SIFE results should be interpreted carefully.

Key concepts: Monoclonal gammopathy, Serum protein electrophoresis, Polyclonal antibodies, Immunofixation, Medicine, Monoclonal, Center (category theory), Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Evaluation of Serum Protein and Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis Results in Patients with Monoclonal and Polyclonal Gammopathy: A Single Center Experience — Research Paper | ScholarLens