2016The Annals of the University of Bucharest Philosophy SeriesOpen access

Reading Foucault as a Pragmatist. Critical Considerations on the Archaeological and Genealogical Methodology of a Foucauldian Pragmatism and on Its Normative Constitution

Oana Șerban

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse and define a certain perspective on Foucault’s pragmatism, from a methodological perspective. The working hypothesis is that Foucault’s pragmatism is based on a methodological dualism, resulted from the synergy of archaeology and genealogy as two traditions of critical inquiry, that are applied to perform problematizations and resolutions of different facts of reality, in terms of “the history of the present”. As a practical research, this article will conclude with the possibilities of deriving both axiological and methodological principles of Foucault’s pragmatism as an autonomous philosophical project, proving its solid normative constitution also by accommodating archaeology and genealogy in order to develop specific operational categories of pragmatism as a critical inquiry, such as “problem”, “solution”, “diagnose”, “position”, “negation”.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this paper is to analyse and define a certain perspective on Foucault’s pragmatism, from a methodological perspective. The working hypothesis is that Foucault’s pragmatism is based on a methodological dualism, resulted from the synergy of archaeology and genealogy as two traditions of critical inquiry, that are applied to perform problematizations and resolutions of different facts of reality, in terms of “the history of the present”. As a practical research, this article will conclude with the possibilities of deriving both axiological and methodological principles of Foucault’s pragmatism as an autonomous philosophical project, proving its solid normative constitution also by accommodating archaeology and genealogy in order to develop specific operational categories of pragmatism as a critical inquiry, such as “problem”, “solution”, “diagnose”, “position”, “negation”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse and define a certain perspective on Foucault’s pragmatism, from a methodological perspective. The working hypothesis is that Foucault’s pragmatism is based on a methodological dualism, resulted from the synergy of archaeology and genealogy as two traditions of critical inquiry, that are applied to perform problematizations and resolutions of different facts of reality, in terms of “the history of the present”. As a practical research, this article will conclude with the possibilities of deriving both axiological and methodological principles of Foucault’s pragmatism as an autonomous philosophical project, proving its solid normative constitution also by accommodating archaeology and genealogy in order to develop specific operational categories of pragmatism as a critical inquiry, such as “problem”, “solution”, “diagnose”, “position”, “negation”.

Key concepts: Pragmatism, Normative, Constitution, Epistemology, Dualism, Negation, Perspective (graphical), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reading Foucault as a Pragmatist. Critical Considerations on the Archaeological and Genealogical Methodology of a Foucauldian Pragmatism and on Its Normative Constitution — Research Paper | ScholarLens