2017Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied SciencesOpen access

Schistosomiasis haematobium prevalence among haematuric patients: Parasitological and immuno-assay

Marwa A. Ghieth, Amr M. Lotfy

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Schistosoma haematobium infection is a clinically important water born parasitic disease. This study was conducted to detect the prevalence of schistosomiasis haematobium among haematuric patients by microscopy and immunoassay. About 474 symptomized patients with urological manifestations and attending Beni-Suef University Hospital, Egypt were subjected to microhaematuria detection using dipstick reagent strip. Positive patients for microhaematuria were subjected to parasitological and immunological assay to detect S. haematobium eggs and antibodies. Haematuria prevalence was 17.7% (n = 84). Egg of S. haematobium wasn’t detected by microscopic examination of urine sediment of all haematuric patients, immunological prevalence of Schistosoma antibodies was 46.4% (n = 39). On comparing seropositive and seronegative patients for schistosomiasis antibodies none of the sociodemographic or clinical data were statistically significant. It was concluded that, negative microscopy for schistosomiasis doesn’t exclude infection. Combination of both clinical and epidemiological data in addition to sensitive diagnostic tools is essential for schistosomiasis. There is a critical need to develop more sensitive method to detect true prevalence of schistosomiasis.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Schistosoma haematobium infection is a clinically important water born parasitic disease. This study was conducted to detect the prevalence of schistosomiasis haematobium among haematuric patients by microscopy and immunoassay. About 474 symptomized patients with urological manifestations and attending Beni-Suef University Hospital, Egypt were subjected to microhaematuria detection using dipstick reagent strip. Positive patients for microhaematuria were subjected to parasitological and immunological assay to detect S. haematobium eggs and antibodies. Haematuria prevalence was 17.7% (n = 84). Egg of S. haematobium wasn’t detected by microscopic examination of urine sediment of all haematuric patients, immunological prevalence of Schistosoma antibodies was 46.4% (n = 39). On comparing seropositive and seronegative patients for schistosomiasis antibodies none of the sociodemographic or clinical data were statistically significant. It was concluded that, negative microscopy for schistosomiasis doesn’t exclude infection. Combination of both clinical and epidemiological data in addition to sensitive diagnostic tools is essential for schistosomiasis. There is a critical need to develop more sensitive method to detect true prevalence of schistosomiasis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Schistosoma haematobium infection is a clinically important water born parasitic disease. This study was conducted to detect the prevalence of schistosomiasis haematobium among haematuric patients by microscopy and immunoassay. About 474 symptomized patients with urological manifestations and attending Beni-Suef University Hospital, Egypt were subjected to microhaematuria detection using dipstick reagent strip. Positive patients for microhaematuria were subjected to parasitological and immunological assay to detect S. haematobium eggs and antibodies. Haematuria prevalence was 17.7% (n = 84). Egg of S. haematobium wasn’t detected by microscopic examination of urine sediment of all haematuric patients, immunological prevalence of Schistosoma antibodies was 46.4% (n = 39). On comparing seropositive and seronegative patients for schistosomiasis antibodies none of the sociodemographic or clinical data were statistically significant. It was concluded that, negative microscopy for schistosomiasis doesn’t exclude infection. Combination of both clinical and epidemiological data in addition to sensitive diagnostic tools is essential for schistosomiasis. There is a critical need to develop more sensitive method to detect true prevalence of schistosomiasis.

Key concepts: Schistosoma haematobium, Schistosomiasis, Dipstick, Helminthiasis, Immunology, Urine, Medicine, Epidemiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Schistosomiasis haematobium prevalence among haematuric patients: Parasitological and immuno-assay — Research Paper | ScholarLens