2016International Journal of Law in ContextRequires access

Prefatory Comments: Anthropological expertise and legal practice: about false dichotomies, the difficulties of handling objectivity and unique opportunities for the future of a discipline

Marie–Claire Foblets

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Prefatory Comments: Anthropological expertise and legal practice: about false dichotomies, the difficulties of handling objectivity and unique opportunities for the future of a discipline - Volume 12 Issue 3

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Prefatory Comments: Anthropological expertise and legal practice: about false dichotomies, the difficulties of handling objectivity and unique opportunities for the future of a discipline - Volume 12 Issue 3

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Prefatory Comments: Anthropological expertise and legal practice: about false dichotomies, the difficulties of handling objectivity and unique opportunities for the future of a discipline - Volume 12 Issue 3

Key concepts: Dichotomy, Objectivity (philosophy), Epistemology, Sociology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prefatory Comments: Anthropological expertise and legal practice: about false dichotomies, the difficulties of handling objectivity and unique opportunities for the future of a discipline — Research Paper | ScholarLens